ArticleRSC advances2025
A high-performance reagent-less sensor based on copper(ii) phthalocyanines supported by multi-walled carbon nanotubes for phosphate detection.
Article in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Phosphate concentration is an important indicator of water quality, specifically for eutrophication levels in the presence of algae. Several analytical techniques have been proposed for phosphate monitoring, and most of them are based on indirect methods. In this study, we propose a new reagent-less direct method for the electrochemical detection of phosphate in aqueous solutions. For this, carbon screen printed electrodes (CSPE) were modified with copper(ii)-phthalocyanines (CuPc) that offer excellent oxidoreduction and electrocatalytic properties, together with chemically modified multiwalled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs) to enhance the electrocatalytic performance of the sensor. We implemented two detection methods, which are electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and square wave voltammetry (SWV) to compare them. The developed sensor exhibits a remarkable detection limit of 1.15 μM in the range from 10 μM to 100 μM with voltammetry and 0.13 nM in the range from 0.001 μM to 100 μM with impedance, enabling accurate measurement of phosphate concentrations in water samples. Thus, EIS shows a better sensitivity towards phosphate reduction. Furthermore, the developed sensor shows good performance in the presence of possibly interfering species that usually coexist with phosphate ions, as well as the applicability of the sensor in real water samples (tap water and nutrient water from an aquaponic system) at a good recovery rate. The electrode's response is highly reproducible with a relative standard deviation lower than 10%.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.