Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40103977›Full record

ReviewRSC advances2025

A review on assessment of ionic liquids in extraction of lithium, nickel, and cobalt

Pratima Meshram, Nikita Agarwal, Abhilash

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in RSC advances, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Pratima MeshramCSIR-National Metallurgical Laboratory Jamshedpur 831007 India abhilash@nml.res.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0241-7347
Nikita AgarwalCSIR-National Metallurgical Laboratory Jamshedpur 831007 India abhilash@nml.res.in.
AbhilashCSIR-National Metallurgical Laboratory Jamshedpur 831007 India abhilash@nml.res.in.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1147-4677

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review discusses the extraction of critical metals (Li, Co, and Ni) using ionic liquids. Here, ionic liquids act as solvents for the separation and extraction of metals. In addition to extraction, they can be used as a lixiviant to leach out metals from spent lithium-ion batteries. Leaching and extraction of metals from the leachate can be performed using a single ionic liquid solvent. Lithium, cobalt, and nickel have been discussed in detail as per their reactivity towards an ionic liquid based on the extraction efficiency and reusability of the ionic liquid. Recycling and reusability of ionic liquids are crucial parameters to be considered while using them as solvents for extracting metals. Moreover, all the other methods such as solvent extraction, ion exchange, ionic liquids, and DES-based separation of metals are compared with respect to their extraction efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and reusability.

Identifiers

PMID40103977
PMCPMC11915085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.