ArticleInternational journal of ophthalmology2025
Contributions from light level and spectral content on refractive development in young rabbits.
Article in International journal of ophthalmology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimTo compare the effects of manipulating light levels versus manipulating the spectral content of short wavelengths (blue light) of ambient lighting on refractive development in young rabbits.
methodsA total of 32 healthy 3-week-old rabbits were randomly assigned to one of the four groups with 8 in each group for 12wk: Control group (NC) under low blue light (output ratio of blue light 1.8%) at low illuminance (341 lx), HI group under low blue light (output ratio of blue light 1.6%) at high illuminance (5057 lx), simulating natural light (S-NL) group under high blue light (output ratio of blue light 4.9%) at high illuminance (5052 lx), and MB group under high blue light (output ratio of blue light 5.2%) at low illuminance (342 lx). The lighting in each group were provided by light emitting diode (LED) lamps emitting visible light (range 380-780 nm) in addition to (or not) LED lamps only emitting short wavelength (range 380-500 nm). Refraction, axial length, and corneal curvature radius were assessed by retinoscopy, ultrasonography and keratometry, respectively. Average data of both eyes for each animal were used as single values and compared among groups.
resultsDuring the 12-week intervention, all animals had an emmetropization period. The decrease of refraction in rabbits in HI group was similar to S-NL group, both slower than that of NC group (
conclusionThe light levels per se but not the rich in spectral content of short wavelengths determine the inhibitory effect of ambient lighting on myopia development in rabbits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.