ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
Interpretable prediction of stroke prognosis: SHAP for SVM and nomogram for logistic regression.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Coagulation Risk Prediction in Patients With Liver Failure: Integrated Meta-Analysis and Machine Learning Model Study.JMIR medical informatics · 2025Pooled it
- Decision tree with randomized grid search-based hyperparameter tuning and optimal feature scaling for diabetes diagnosis.BMC bioinformatics · 2026Article
- A Multicenter Prospective Study to Develop a Prediction Model for Postherpetic Neuralgia Using Clinical and Laboratory Indicators.Pain and therapy · 2026Article
- Efficacy and comparative performance of machine learning models for stroke risk prediction in hypertensive patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of cardiology. Cardiovascular risk and prevention · 2026Review
- Machine learning-based prediction model for cognitive frailty in elderly patients with ischaemic stroke: a prospective cohort study.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Article
- A Bayesian network-based predictive model for gout onset risk: associations with traditional Chinese medicine constitution in hyperuricemic populations.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Evaluating comorbidity scoring systems for flumatinib therapy in chronic myeloid leukemia: a machine learning and SHAP-based predictive analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Risk factors for prolonged respiratory support in late preterm infants: a LASSO-Cox regression analysis.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Article
- Predicting early neurological deterioration in acute branch atheromatous disease without reperfusion therapy: a machine learning model.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Article
- Interpretable SVM Model for Predicting CMV Infection in Seropositive Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Infection and drug resistance · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning-based predictive model for malnutrition in subacute post-stroke patients: an internal and external validation study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2025Article
- Explainable XGBoost model and nomogram for risk factor identification and risk prediction in cerebral small vessel disease: a machine learning-based retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in neurologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ischemic Stroke (IS) stands as a leading cause of mortality and disability globally, with an anticipated increase in IS-related fatalities by 2030. Despite therapeutic advancements, many patients still lack effective interventions, underscoring the need for improved prognostic assessment tools. Machine Learning (ML) models have emerged as promising tools for predicting stroke prognosis, surpassing traditional methods in accuracy and speed. Objective: The aim of this study was to develop and validate ML algorithms for predicting the 6-month prognosis of patients with Acute Cerebral Infarction, using clinical data from two medical centers in China, and to assess the feasibility of implementing Explainable ML in clinical settings. Methods: A retrospective observational cohort study was conducted involving 398 patients diagnosed with Acute Cerebral Infarction from January 2023 to February 2024. The dataset included demographic information, medical histories, clinical evaluations, and laboratory results. Six ML models were constructed: Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Support Vector Machine (SVM), Random Forest, XGBoost, and AdaBoost. Model performance was evaluated using the Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and F1 score, with five-fold cross-validation to ensure robustness. Results: The training set, identified key variables associated with stroke prognosis, including hypertension, diabetes, and smoking history. The SVM model demonstrated exceptional performance, with an AUC of 0.9453 on the training set and 0.9213 on the validation set. A Nomogram based on Logistic Regression was developed for visualizing prognostic risk, incorporating factors such as the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, Barthel Index (BI), Watanabe Drinking Test (KWST) score, Platelet Distribution Width (PDW), and others. Our models showed high predictive accuracy and stability across both datasets. Conclusion: This study presents a robust ML approach for predicting stroke prognosis, with the SVM model and Nomogram providing valuable tools for clinical decision-making. By incorporating advanced ML techniques, we enhance the precision of prognostic assessments and offer a theoretical and practical framework for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.