ArticleFrontiers in neurology2025
A patient-centered qualitative evaluation of meaningful change on the NSAA and PUL in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Elbow Flexors Muscle Fat Fraction Is a Sensitive and Relevant Outcome Measure in Nonambulant Patients With DMD.NMR in biomedicine · 2026Article
- Parent/caregiver perspectives of meaningful improvement in functional domains for people with CDKL5 deficiency disorder: a mixed-methods study.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy (DMD) is a rare X-linked genetic disorder caused by mutations in the dystrophin gene. The North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) and Performance of Upper Limb (PUL) are used to measure motor performance in ambulatory and non-ambulatory individuals, respectively. There is limited published qualitative evidence on what constitutes a meaningful change on either instrument. The aim of this study is to understand meaningful change in functional abilities as measured by the NSAA and PUL at different ability levels from the perspective of individuals with DMD, caregivers of individuals with DMD, and clinicians. Methods: The study utilized a non-interventional, descriptive, cross-sectional qualitative design consisting of 69 semi-structured interviews, including individuals with DMD ( Results: The results for both instruments indicated that: (i) items that are meaningful differ based on ability level; (ii) maintaining function in lower and upper limbs is the ultimate goal; (iii) meaningful change is often reported in relation to gain or loss of specific function, as opposed to number of total points on the scale; and (iv) losing one scale point corresponds to either a partial or full loss in function and activity, which has differing impacts on daily life. Conclusion: The perception of meaningful change in DMD as measured by the NSAA is influenced by ability levels and ambulatory function, with participants describing their need to maximize certain abilities, maintain function, and retain independence. For the PUL, participants underscored the importance of maintenance of their functional abilities, and highlighted key themes related to maintaining independence in ADLs, reaching, eating/drinking, and finger function for technology use across score categories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.