ReviewFrontiers in aging neuroscience2025
Sex, senescence, senolytics, and cognition.
Review in Frontiers in aging neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Senescent cells in systemic aging: SASP heterogeneity, immune escape, and endocrine modulation.Biogerontology · 2026Review
- Exploring the Senotherapeutic Potential of Polyphenols in Aging and Disease: A Literature Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Interaction between perceived ageism and poor sleep quality on frailty among community-dwelling older adults: a cross-sectional study.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Insights on geroscience pre-clinical and clinical trials to promote healthy aging from the Intrinsic Capacity, Frailty and Sarcopenia Research Task Force 2025.The Journal of frailty & aging · 2026Review
- The triangular drivers of bone aging: mechanistic insights and therapeutic targets in cellular senescence, estrogen deficiency, and gut microenvironment dysregulation.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Autophagy-senescence interplay in kidney disease: mechanistic insights and therapeutic potential.Molecular biology reports · 2025Review
- Neurotransmission Sex Dichotomy in the Rat Hypothalamic Paraventricular Nucleus in Healthy and Infantile Spasm Model.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review focuses on sexual dimorphism in cellular senescence and senolytic treatment in relation to brain health and age-related cognitive decline. The stressors of aging, DNA damage, inflammation, and oxidative stress induce cell senescence, a hallmark of aging. Senescent cells change their function and molecular profile and are primed to release pro-inflammatory cytokines. The functional changes include the activation of cell signals to prevent cell death. The release of pro-inflammatory cytokines from peripheral senescent cells during middle age induces senescence of neighbor cells and heightens the level of systemic inflammation, contributing to neuroinflammation. In response to neuroinflammation and oxidative stress, some neurons alter their physiology, decreasing neuronal excitability and synaptic transmission. Senescent neurophysiology is protective against cell death due to excitotoxicity, at the expense of a loss of normal cell function, contributing to age-related cognitive decline. The level of peripheral cell senescence and systemic inflammation may underlie sexual dimorphism in the prevalence, symptoms, and pathogenesis of age-related diseases, including neurodegenerative diseases. Sex differences have been observed for senescence of astrocytes, microglia, and peripheral cells, including those involved in innate and adaptive immune responses. Interventions that remove senescent cells, such as senolytic drugs, can reduce or ameliorate some of the aging-related loss of function. Similarities and differences in senolytic responses of males and females depend on the system examined, the treatment regimen, the level of senescent cell burden, and the age when treatment is initiated. Estrogen impacts several of these factors and influences the transcription of genes promoting growth, proliferation, and cell survival programs in a manner opposite that of senolytic drugs. In addition, estrogen has anti-aging effects that are independent of cell senescence, including rapidly modifying senescent neurophysiology. Thus, it is important to recognize that, in addition to sex differences in cell senescence, there are other sexually dimorphic mechanisms that contribute to the aging process. The results indicate that senolytics interact with fundamental biology, including sex hormones.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.