ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
Early Detection and Intervention: A Framework for Preventing Academic Failure in Medical Students.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Academic failure is multifactorial with personal, institutional, and societal factors. Identification after high stake assessments comes too late for meaningful interventions. There is limited data to predict academic failure at an early stage. This qualitative exploratory study aimed to identify such students using a predictive framework. Using purposive sampling, twenty-seven participants (8 academic failures, 8 high achievers, and 7 medical teachers) were enrolled after informed consent and ethical approval. One-to-one interviews with eight academic failures and two focused group discussions (FGDs), one with the high achievers and the teachers were conducted online using a validated questionnaire. Thematic analysis and blended coding was done manually with member checking and triangulation. Key predictors included poor self-regulation, procrastination, emotional imbalance, low self-efficacy, cognitive overload, and non-reflective practices. Key components of the framework suggested are documentation of students' prior academic results and professional choice, at the time of admission as well as behavioral traits and performance in formative assessments. Close observation of procrastination, emotional state, and self-efficacy during small group discussions by teachers followed by feedback will identify students at risk. Reflective practices by both students and teachers during feedback sessions will uncover hidden learning gaps. In conclusion, "potential academic failures" can be identified and supported by observation, documentation, and reflective practices by teachers and students using proposed framework.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.