ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
Effect of ERAS-Based Rapid Bladder Irrigation on TURP and HoLEP in the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To explore the positive effect of rapid bladder irrigation in postoperative BPH patients by collecting and analyzing the efficacy and complications of TURP and HoLEP treatments for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) under ERAS care. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 197 BPH patients undergoing surgical treatment at the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University from April 2022 to February 2024. All patients received rapid bladder irrigation under ERAS care, which involves flushing the bladder with a larger volume of saline solution in a shorter time postoperatively compared to conventional bladder irrigation care. Afterward, clinical data and postoperative irrigation indicators for each group were collected and analyzed. Results: Patients in the T1 group were observed with larger prostate volume, longer operation time, and more intraoperative blood loss than those in the T2 group, but with shorter duration of indwelling urinary catheters, shorter irrigation time, and shorter hospital stays (P<0.05). Meanwhile, the H1 group saw lower mean irrigation volume and shorter irrigation time than the H2 group. Differences were found between the T1 and H1 groups in terms of mean irrigation volume and irrigation time (P<0.05), Additionally, patients in the T2 group had lower prostate volume than those in the H2 group, with differences in mean irrigation volume and irrigation time (P<0.05). Conclusion: ERAS concept complements rapid bladder irrigation, which shortens the time to self-care recovery and discharge, thereby facilitating faster postoperative recovery for BPH patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.