ArticlePakistan journal of medical sciences2025
Steps initiated for sustainability of faculty mentorship program at Aga Khan University Medical College: A mixed method study.
Article in Pakistan journal of medical sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate and address challenges in faculty mentorship for sustainability of Faculty Mentorship Program (FMP) at Aga Khan University Medical College (AKU-MC). Methods: This is a mixed method study conducted from June 2021 to December 2023 at AKU-MC. It comprises of the exploration of qualitative insights into the challenges faced by mentors, mentees, and administrators, also incorporating quantitative measures of success to evaluate the sustainability of the program over time. Data was retrieved from four Focus group discussions (FGD) with mentors and mentees, eight in depth interviews with the administrators of FMP and leadership. Challenges of faculty mentorship were further identified by a panel discussion and briefing sessions with faculty members of different departments at AKU-MC. Challenges identified by three data sets were presented to the FMP committee, discussed in forum meetings and recommendations were proposed for the sustainability of the program. Results: During the interviews, mentors revealed 'Limited Training and 'Lack of Recognition' as key challenges whereas mentees mentioned deficient skills in planning developmental goals. Administrators mentioned the need to enhance the visibility of the program as well as to update the resources. Panel discussion highlighted the need for recognition of mentors and providing them with protected time. Departmental meetings endorsed the need for sequential training of both mentors and mentees. To address these challenges educational grand rounds, international conferences and webinar were conducted to enhance the visibility of the program. Mentors were acknowledged by appreciation emails and tokens of appreciation. A series of workshops to enhance mentoring skills were planned and executed. Conclusion: The FMP at AKU-MC has devised a stepwise strategy to address challenges in faculty mentorship. This approach emphasizes collaboration with departments and the active involvement of leadership. By incorporating rewards, recognition, and a series of workshops, the program aims to foster a strong mentorship culture within the university. These efforts align with the objective of investigating and resolving mentorship challenges to ensure the sustainability of the Faculty Mentorship Program at AKU-MC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.