ArticleOphthalmology science
Sex Differences in Age-Related Changes in Retinal Arteriovenous Area Based on Deep Learning Segmentation Model.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ethnicity-Stratified Normative Retinal Vascular Features from the UK Biobank Using Deep Learning.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
- Quantifying regional contributions to sex classification from fundus photographs via a two-stage attention-based deep learning approach.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Retinal Arteriosclerosis in a Large Health Screening Cohort: Associations with Systemic Vascular Comorbidities and Stroke in Young Adults.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- A deep learning-based pachychoroid index based on choroidal image patterns of central serous chorioretinopathy using enhanced-depth-imaging optical coherence tomography.Japanese journal of ophthalmology · 2026Observational
- Inter-Relationships Between the Deep Learning-Based Pachychoroid Index and Clinical Features Associated with Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.