ArticleOphthalmology science
Quantitative Mapping of Posterior Eye Curvature in Children Using Distortion-Corrected OCT: Insights into Temporal Region Morphology.
Article in Ophthalmology science. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Noninterchangeability of Vessel Density Measurements Across Next-Generation SS-OCTA Systems.Translational vision science & technology · 2026Article
- Re: Hiraoka et al: Quantitative Mapping of Posterior Eye Curvature in Children Using Distortion-Corrected OCT: Insights into Temporal Region Morphology.Ophthalmology science · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To explore the curvature distribution in the posterior eye among school-aged children using distortion-corrected widefield OCT and its relationship with biometric variables. Design: Cross-sectional, observational study. Participants: Eighty-eight children. Methods: A swept-source-OCT prototype system with a repetition rate of 400 kHz was used to capture widefield retinal OCT images with a field-of-view of 68 × 68 degrees. The acquired OCT images were corrected for distortion using ocular optical information obtained separately for each eye. The posterior eye curvature was represented by the Gaussian curvature which was derived from Bruch's membrane segmentation. The mean Gaussian curvature was assessed across 4 regions set centered on the fovea, considering axial length (AL), refractive error, age, and choroidal thickness (ChT). Additionally, we identified the entry site of the long posterior ciliary artery (LPCA) into the choroid. Main Outcome Measures: Local curvature distribution in the posterior eye. Results: A total of 176 eyes were imaged, with 7 excluded due to low image quality. Analysis of 169 OCT images revealed bilateral symmetry in choroidal vascular patterns and posterior eye curvature. Significant correlations were noted between mean curvature and AL, refractive error, and ChT in the superior, macular, and inferior regions. However, the temporal region exhibited reversed correlation trends. A local maximum curvature point was commonly observed in the temporal region, potentially linked to the LPCA entry site. Conclusions: Our study provided a quantitative analysis of posterior eye curvature in children, highlighting a local maximum curvature point in the temporal region. Interestingly, the relationships between mean curvature and biometric variables in the temporal region contradicted those in the other 3 regions. Further investigation is necessary to elucidate its origin and implications for ocular development. Financial Disclosures: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.