ArticleFrontiers in immunology2025
Integrative analysis of semaphorins family genes in colorectal cancer: implications for prognosis and immunotherapy.
Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comprehensive single-cell analysis reveals cellular heterogeneity and immune interactions in colorectal cancer.Translational oncology · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence for the Diagnosis and Management of Cancers: Potentials and Challenges.MedComm · 2025Review
- Cis-regulation analysis of RNA m6A methylation and gene expression in colorectal cancer.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Semaphorins (SEMAs), originally identified as axon guidance factors, have been found to play crucial roles in tumor growth, invasiveness, neoangiogenesis, and the modulation of immune responses. However, the prognostic value of SEMA-related genes in colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unclear. Methods: We applied a novel machine learning framework that incorporated 10 machine learning algorithms and their 101 combinations to construct a SEMAs-related score (SRS). Multi-omics analysis was performed, including single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), and spatial transcriptome (ST) to gain a more comprehensive understanding of the SRS. A series of cell experiments were conducted to prove the impact of key genes on CRC biological behavior. Result: A consensus SRS was finally constructed based on a 101-combination machine learning computational framework, demonstrating outstanding performance in predicting overall survival. Moreover, distinct biological functions, mutation burden, immune cell infiltration, and immunotherapy response were observed between the high- and low-SRS groups. scRNA-seq and ST demonstrated unique cellular heterogeneity in CRC. We observed that SRS-high and SRS-low malignant epithelial cells exhibit different biological characteristics. High SRS malignant epithelial cells interact with myeloid and endothelial cells via SPP1 and COL4A2-ITGAV-ITGB8 pathways, respectively. Low SRS cells engage with myeloid and endothelial cells through MIF and JAG1-NOTCH4 pathways. Additionally, knocking down SEMA4C significantly inhibits the proliferation and invasion of CRC cells, while promoting apoptosis Conclusion: SRS could serve as an effective tool to predict survival and identify potential patients benefiting from immunotherapy in CRC. It also reveals tumor heterogeneity and provides valuable biological insights in CRC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.