Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40103772›Full record

ArticleMethodsX2025

Simple DNA extraction for museum beetle specimens to unlock genetic data from historical collections.

Hathal M Al-Dhafer, Raju Balaji, Mahmoud S Abdel-Dayem, Iftekhar Rasool, Amr Mohamed, Senthilkumar Palanisamy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in MethodsX, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hathal M Al-DhaferPlant Protection Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Raju BalajiCenter for Global Health Research, Saveetha Medical College and Hospital, Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences, Thandalam, Kancheepuram District, Tamil Nadu, India.
Mahmoud S Abdel-DayemPlant Protection Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Iftekhar RasoolPlant Protection Department, College of Food and Agriculture Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Amr MohamedDepartment of Entomology, Faculty of Science, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt.
Senthilkumar PalanisamyDepartment of Genetic Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur, Tamil Nadu, 603203, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Museum beetle specimens are valuable resources for genetic analyses; however, obtaining DNA from aged specimens remains challenging due to degradation, desiccation, and contamination. In this study, we present a simple, low-cost protocol for extracting DNA from museum beetles, optimized using cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB). This method effectively addresses common issues such as DNA fragmentation and contamination, enabling the recovery of DNA suitable for downstream applications such as PCR and next-generation sequencing. It provides a reproducible, non-destructive approach to extracting genetic material from fragile beetle specimens, thereby facilitating molecular investigations in fields such as taxonomy and conservation biology. The protocol is summarized as follows:•A method for DNA extraction is optimized for museum beetle specimens preserved for over 45 years.•The protocol is non-destructive and compatible with PCR and next-generation sequencing.•Multiple extractions can be pooled to increase yields, particularly when DNA concentrations are low. This method broadens the possibilities for genetic analysis of historical specimens, offering new insights into long-term ecological and evolutionary processes.

Indexed as

CTAB methodDNA extractionDNA extraction and PCR amplification of COI barcodeMuseum beetleNext-generation sequencingPCR amplification

Identifiers

PMID40103772
PMCPMC11914976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.