Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40103744›Full record

ArticleHealth science reports2025

Perceived Connectedness to Nature in Fitness Enthusiasts, Golfers, and Climbers: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.

Daniela Haluza, Markus Spletzer, Julia Ortmann, David Jungwirth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health science reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniela HaluzaDepartment of Environmental Health, Center for Public Health Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-5619-2863
Markus SpletzerDepartment of Environmental Health, Center for Public Health Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
Julia OrtmannDepartment of Environmental Health, Center for Public Health Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.
David JungwirthDepartment of Environmental Health, Center for Public Health Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Aims: Connectedness to nature (CN) refers to the degree to which individuals feel a connection with the natural environment. CN has been associated with physical activity, life satisfaction, well-being, and pro-environmental behavior, making it a potential resource for both human and planetary health. This study aimed to compare self-reported CN levels among three groups of physically active individuals in the general adult population using two established CN measures: the Nature Relatedness-6 Scale (NR-6) and the Connectedness to Nature Single Item (CN-SI). Methods: A large sample of 3357 participants, consisting of 1214 fitness enthusiasts, 1115 golfers, and 1028 climbers, participated in three targeted cross-sectional online surveys. CN levels were assessed using the NR-6 and CN-SI scales. Differences between groups were analyzed using statistical comparisons. Results: Climbers exhibited significantly higher NR-6 scores compared to fitness enthusiasts and golfers, indicating a stronger sense of nature relatedness. However, CN-SI scores were highest among golfers. These findings suggest variations in CN perceptions depending on the type of physical activity performed. Conclusion: Engaging in physical activity that involves direct interaction with nature, such as outdoor climbing, may enhance individuals' sense of connection with the natural environment. Given the negative health impacts of sedentary lifestyles, promoting outdoor physical activity could serve as a dual approach to improving both personal well-being and environmental awareness, fostering sustainability in the long term.

Indexed as

connection to naturelife satisfactionnatural environmentsnature relatednessphysical activityrecreationwell‐being

Identifiers

PMID40103744
PMCPMC11915121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.