ReviewPain reports2025
The role of androgens on experimental pain sensitivity: a systemic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Pain reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changes in hormones and experimental pain sensitivity in healthy girls: an exploratory longitudinal pilot study.Pain reports · 2026Article
- The genetic architecture of fibromyalgia across 2.5 million individuals.Nature medicine · 2026Article
- Features of Changes in Plasma Concentrations of Sex Hormones in Female Rats at Different Stages of Experimental Pain Syndrome in the Maxillofacial Region.Bulletin of experimental biology and medicine · 2026Article
- Exploring the Influence of Testosterone on Pain Perception and Modulation Among Men with Low and Normal Testosterone Concentrations.Journal of pain research · 2026Article
- Article
- The genetic architecture of fibromyalgia across 2.5 million individuals.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2025Article
- Pain in polycystic ovary syndrome: a comprehensive bedside to bench perspective on an underrecognized symptom.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Animal studies have shown androgens, especially testosterone, may have an analgesic effect on nociceptive behavior. However, it is unclear if this effect is present in humans. This review and meta-analysis aim to summarize and synthesize the role of androgens on experimental pain sensitivity in humans. Studies were included if they examined the (1) relationships between androgens and experimental pain sensitivity, (2) group differences in androgen or pain levels, and (3) the effect of androgen interventions on experimental pain sensitivity. After a comprehensive search, 31 papers were identified. When possible, meta-analyses were performed. Most studies examined the impact of testosterone on experimental pain, and only a few studies focused on other androgens, such as dehydroepiandrosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate. Overall, the current data do not support the effect of androgens on experimental pain sensitivity in adult men and women with or without chronic pain. In addition, meta-analyses of Pearson correlations did not find relationships between testosterone levels and pain ratings of heat stimulus (3 studies, n = 93, Z correlation coefficient = -0.43, confidence intervals [-1.50, 0.64]) or electrical pain thresholds (4 studies, n = 147, Z correlation coefficient = 0.24, confidence intervals [-0.10, 0.58]). Moreover, contradicting results were found in intervention studies that increased or decreased testosterone levels. Thus, it is suggested that the role of testosterone on experimental pain sensitivity may be minor, even though there is a wide heterogeneity between studies. Future studies should examine the impact of other androgens and the interaction between testosterone and other hormones on experimental pain sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.