Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40103697›Full record

ReviewIbrain2025

Research progress on the depth of anesthesia monitoring based on the electroencephalogram.

Xiaolan He, Tingting Li, Xiao Wang

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ibrain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Xiaolan HeDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu China.ORCID 0009-0004-5980-0974
Tingting LiDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu China.ORCID 0000-0001-6041-6719
Xiao WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, West China Hospital Sichuan University Chengdu China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

General anesthesia typically involves three key components: amnesia, analgesia, and immobilization. Monitoring the depth of anesthesia (DOA) during surgery is crucial for personalizing anesthesia regimens and ensuring precise drug delivery. Since general anesthetics act primarily on the brain, this organ becomes the target for monitoring DOA. Electroencephalogram (EEG) can record the electrical activity generated by various brain tissues, enabling anesthesiologists to monitor the DOA from real-time changes in a patient's brain activity during surgery. This monitoring helps to optimize anesthesia medication, prevent intraoperative awareness, and reduce the incidence of cardiovascular and other adverse events, contributing to anesthesia safety. Different anesthetic drugs exert different effects on the EEG characteristics, which have been extensively studied in commonly used anesthetic drugs. However, due to the limited understanding of the biological basis of consciousness and the mechanisms of anesthetic drugs acting on the brain, combined with the effects of various factors on existing EEG monitors, DOA cannot be accurately expressed via EEG. The lack of patient reactivity during general anesthesia does not necessarily indicate unconsciousness, highlighting the importance of distinguishing the mechanisms of consciousness and conscious connectivity when monitoring perioperative anesthesia depth. Although EEG is an important means of monitoring DOA, continuous optimization is necessary to extract characteristic information from EEG to monitor DOA, and EEG monitoring technology based on artificial intelligence analysis is an emerging research direction.

Indexed as

consciousnessdeep learning structureelectroencephalogramthe depth of anesthesia monitoring

Identifiers

PMID40103697
PMCPMC11911112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.