Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40103688›Full record

ArticleVeterinary and animal science2025

Effect of a mix of condense and hydrolysable tannins feed additive on lactating dairy cows' services per conception and days open.

Alejandro R Castillo, Julio A Di Rienzo, Damiano Cavallini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Predictive performance and farmer satisfaction ofVeterinary and animal science · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Long-TermAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alejandro R CastilloUniversity of California, Cooperative Extension, Merced, CA. 95340, USA.
Julio A Di RienzoFacultad Cs. Agropecuarias, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba. 5000, Argentina.
Damiano CavalliniDipartimento di Scienze Mediche Veterinarie, Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A commercial dairy farm with two dairy units (about 3000 cows each), similar management and diets was used to evaluate the effect of a feed additive based on a mix of condense and hydrolysable tannins (ByPro®) on lactating cow services per conception and days open. The experiment was divided in three evaluation periods. Period I, January-March (without-feed additive), Period II, April-September, all cows in one dairy unit received the mix-tannins feed additive at 0.3 % of the total estimated DMI per cow. Period III, October-December (without-feed additive). Services per conception was modeled as a Poisson count using a generalized linear model with log link function. Days open was modeled with a generalized linear model for a gamma variable with log link function. The models included: dairy units (2), periods (3), and their interactions. No significant differences were observed in Period I. During the evaluation Period II, the mix tannins feed additive increased the artificial insemination efficiency, reducing (

Indexed as

Condensed and hydrolysable tanninsDairy cowsDays openServices per conception

Identifiers

PMID40103688
PMCPMC11914815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.