ReviewJournal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open2025
Use of Ultrasound in the Prehospital Setting: A Scoping Review.
Review in Journal of the American College of Emergency Physicians open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Pre-hospital and emergency department point-of-care ultrasound in cardiovascular emergencies: a scoping review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
- Point-of-care ultrasound in prehospital emergency care: attitudes, facilitators and barriers.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- Real world evaluation of a distance-supervised ultrasound training programme in a physician-staffed emergency medical service: a prospective, descriptive implementation study.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2026Observational
- Point-of-care ultrasound during trauma and critical care transport: a practical, safety-gated review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Patient profiles and P-HEMS specific interventions performed by a HEMS team in the netherlands; A retrospective cohort study of 18,199 patients.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2025Article
- Transcranial Ultrasound in the Helicopter Emergency Medical Services-A Feasibility Study.Journal of neuroimaging : official journal of the American Society of NeuroimagingArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: With the advent of portable devices, prehospital ultrasound is increasingly available and has the potential to provide clinical and procedural decision support. This scoping review seeks to examine current literature on prehospital ultrasound, including study indications, the level of the health care professionals performing prehospital ultrasound, and reported research outcomes. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane databases for research articles and conference abstracts focused on prehospital ultrasound with scans performed in the field. After title/abstract screening by 2 independent reviewers, a full-text review was performed. We excluded reviews, case reports, letters to the editor, and research published in nonEnglish language. Descriptive statistics were reported. Results: We identified 9718 unique articles, and 109 were included after title/abstract review (Kappa 0.68) and full-text analysis. Annual publications increased yearly ( Conclusion: There is a growing, heterogeneous body of literature describing the use of prehospital ultrasound. Published literature was primarily prospective and described feasibility trials. Identified gaps include a lack of studies in pediatric patients and research identifying clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.