ArticleJournal of experimental orthopaedics2025
Intraoperative robotic measurements of coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty correlate with pre- and post-operative long-leg radiographs.
Article in Journal of experimental orthopaedics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimizing arthroplasty outcomes: the impact of artificial intelligence and robotic assistance.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Review
- Intraoperative robotic measurements of coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty correlate with pre- and post-operative long-leg radiographs.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study sought to validate intraoperative robotic measurements of femoral and tibial component coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by comparing to pre- and post-operative standing, double stance, long-leg radiographs (LLR). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 59 unique patients undergoing primary TKA at a single institution. Pre- and post-operative femoral and tibial coronal alignment were measured on LLRs using a deep learning artificial intelligence model and compared to measurements obtained from the imageless robotic system to evaluate the robot's accuracy and reliability. Results: Robotic measurements were highly correlated with measurements from preoperative LLR (Pearson Conclusions: The findings of this study suggest that there were no significant differences in the coronal alignment of TKA when assessed by a robotic system compared to LLR. This signifies the robotic system's high intraoperative accuracy and reliability in determining coronal alignment. Level of Evidence: Level III.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.