Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40103654›Full record

ArticleGlobal advances in integrative medicine and health

Moral Distress as a Critical Driver of Burnout in Medicine.

Amy Locke, Tanya L Rodgers, Margaret L Dobson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Global advances in integrative medicine and health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Amy LockeUniversity of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6127-5361
Tanya L RodgersDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Margaret L DobsonDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are many known drivers of burnout and distress among physicians and other healthcare providers. Current conversations have not fully characterized the significant impact of workload increases alongside staffing shortages as drivers of moral distress and subsequent burnout. Together these factors pose a significant systemic threat to the workforce, and a personal threat to the individuals within it. Physicians are at high risk for moral distress because of work ethic and culture. The drive to do the right thing for the patient limits an ability to set boundaries around work. Moral distress is experienced when the needs of patients can't be met; this drives us to work even harder. Culturally, there has been limited opportunity to acknowledge this distress, so we haven't been able to deal with it outright. Financial pressures continue pressure health systems to drive productivity. Additional patient encounters drive more after visit work that requires time and attention. Simultaneously, the remaining physicians are further stretched as people burnout and leave. There are few groups of workers more mission-driven than primary care physicians. We are committed to doing the right thing for patients and our teams. If we can acknowledge and talk about moral distress as an indicator that we need to change the way we do things, we can use it as a tool to optimize patient care. The physician voice may help us move beyond the learned helplessness and shift to engagement in solutions. We propose three solutions: 1) acknowledge the presence of routinized stress injury that occurs in healthcare 2) leverage data on physician wellbeing to understand how to optimize care, and 3) foster connection and community. Fundamentally, when our healthcare workers feel seen, heard, and valued, they are healthier themselves, and better able to support the missions of the medical system.

Indexed as

burnoutmoral distressmoral injuryphysicians

Identifiers

PMID40103654
PMCPMC11915272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.