Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40103648›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Virtually assisted home rehabilitation after acute stroke (VAST-rehab): A descriptive pilot study for young and underserved stroke survivors.

Emily A Stevens, Neha Muraly, Carolyn P Da Silva, Lorie Richards, Aylen Sosa, Heather Smith, Allyson Seals Richard, Shehzeen Manji, Mary E Russell, Sean I Savitz

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05659784 (Virtually Assisted Home Rehabilitation After Acute STroke), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05659784 nacompletednot on this map

Virtually Assisted Home Rehabilitation After Acute STroke (VAST-rehab)

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas Health Science Center, HoustonRan2020 to 2023Enrolled20ConditionsStrokeArmsTelerehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Emily A StevensInstitute for Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-4401-0298
Neha MuralyMcGovern Medical School, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, US.
Carolyn P Da SilvaSchool of Physical Therapy, Texas Woman's University, Houston, TX, US.
Lorie RichardsDepartment of Occupational and Recreational Therapies, College of Health, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9500-1350
Aylen SosaInstitute for Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, US.
Heather SmithInstitute for Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, US.
Allyson Seals RichardInstitute for Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, US.
Shehzeen ManjiInstitute for Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, US.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6946-817X
Mary E RussellInstitute for Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, US.
Sean I SavitzInstitute for Stroke and Cerebrovascular Disease, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston, TX, US.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The objective of Methods: Participants were recruited from acute care, inpatient rehab, or provider/self-referral if they had a stroke within the previous year, prestroke modified Rankin Scale < 3, were recommended to participate in rehab, and had internet access. Exclusions were: prior injury/diagnoses that impacted functional level, life expectancy of less than six months, or safety concerns. Outcomes were within one week prior to initiation and within one week after completion of telerehabilitation sessions. Video call sessions were completed 1-2 times a week for 12 weeks. Occupational therapy, physical therapy, and/or speech therapy were provided. Analyses involved descriptive statistics; qualitative comments were aggregated and analyzed for broader themes. Twenty participants were consented. Results: Of the 20 participants (39-71 years old, 35% White, 50% female), 12 completed study activities, five completed exit interview; 10 demonstrated improvement on National Institute of Health Stroke Scale from a mean of 5.6 at baseline to 2.7 at end of study, six demonstrated improvement in modified Rankin Score and EuroQol (EQ-5D-5L) scores from a mean of 2.8 to 1.9 and 13.3 to 9.3, respectively, and five demonstrated an increase above the minimally clinically important difference (mean change = 5) on Montreal Cognitive Assessment. On the Stroke Impact Scale rating of total recovery, six of the 12 scored themselves with improvement (mean change = 18.2). Exit interview data revealed an emerging theme: while in-person therapy was preferred, telerehabilitation was an important resource for those without access to in-person therapy. Conclusion: Our study adds to the growing data on the practice of telerehabilitation for survivors of stroke. Future studies are underway to address telerehabilitation serving the uninsured, underinsured, and populations in rural areas. Clinicaltrialsgov ID: NCT05659784.

Indexed as

diseasegenerallifestylemedicineneurologyrehabilitationStroketelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID40103648
PMCPMC11915546

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.