ArticleDigital health
Leveraging healthcare professionals' insights to enhance data quality in medical big data platforms: A qualitative study.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to explore the awareness, attitudes, and actual usage of medical big data platforms among healthcare professionals to provide practical guidance and theoretical support for improving data quality for the development of medical informatization. Method: Semistructured interviews were conducted with 19 doctors and nurses from a tertiary hospital in Wuhan City between April and June 2024. Results: The analysis yielded seven major themes and nine subthemes: cognitive status, Value of Medical Big Data Platforms, data trust (subjective data, objective data), purposes of data recording (patient condition observation, self-protection, task completion), practical challenges (conflict between work purposes and recording requirements, inconsistent departmental training standards, influence of leadership style and team culture), standardization of data recording, and concerns about data privacy. Conclusion: The insufficient understanding of medical big data platforms among healthcare professionals affects the quality of data recording and research value, emphasizing the necessity of strengthening training, standardizing data recording, providing technical support, and ensuring data security.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.