ArticleDigital health
Defining the physiological bounds of left ventricular ejection time with a wireless, wearable ultrasound: An analysis of over 137,000 cardiac cycles.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Flow time (FT) or the left ventricular ejection time (LVET) is the duration of mechanical systole, when the aortic valve is open and ejecting blood. LVET can be measured in the common carotid artery from the time of the systolic upstroke to the incisural notch. FT is directly related to stroke volume (SV) and therefore has important implications for inpatient and outpatient cardiovascular care. Despite this known relationship between FT (i.e., LVET) and SV, large patient datasets describing the distribution and physiological bounds of FT are lacking. Methods: Using a wearable, continuous-wave Doppler ultrasound patch, we are amassing a database of cardiac cycles from the common carotid Doppler pulse in patients and healthy volunteers performing various preload challenges. Results: From this dataset of over 137,000 measurements in 347 patients, we report the mean and distributions of the common carotid artery flow time (i.e., LVET) corrected for heart rate using several prevailing equations. Conclusions: Our findings are the most extensive exploration of the physiological bounds of FT (i.e., LVET) and are useful in both clinical assessments of cardiac health and various algorithm detection applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.