ArticleWellcome open research2024
External validation of an admission risk score for predicting inpatient paediatric mortality in two Kenyan public hospitals.
Article in Wellcome open research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Early identification of children at risk of mortality during hospitalization is crucial in preventing mortality in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). This study aimed to externally validate an admission risk score for predicting inpatient paediatric mortality in resource-limited settings. Methods: This retrospective study utilized routine clinical data of children aged ≤12 years admitted to two Kenyan public hospitals between January 2017 and October 2023. The admission risk score includes 13 clinical predictors, each assigned a value. Aggregate values were used to predict inpatient pediatric mortality, with a higher score indicating a greater risk of death. Children with scores of 0, 1-4 and ≥5 were categorized as low, moderate and high-risk categories, respectively. Discrimination was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were calculated at different cutoff points. Results: A total of 15,606 children were included in the study. Majority of the participants were male (8,847, 56.7%) and aged 12 - 59 months (7,222, 46.3%). Children classified as high-risk had a higher mortality rate (23.4%) than those classified as low risk (2%). The risk score demonstrated moderate discrimination, with an AUC of 0.73 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71 - 0.75). A cutoff of ≥3 achieved a balance between sensitivity and specificity, with values of 63.8% (95% CI: 60.7%-66.9%) and 72.2% (95% CI: 71.5% - 72.9%), respectively, compared to other cutoff points. Conclusion: The risk score performed moderately in predicting inpatient paediatric mortality in two Kenyan public hospitals. The risk score can be used with other clinical assessments to rapidly identify high-risk children and guide targeted interventions to prevent mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.