ReviewARYA atherosclerosis2024
Safety and efficacy of using amplatzer ductal occluder type I and II for peri membranous ventricular septal defect closure: A systematic review.
Review in ARYA atherosclerosis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comparison of KONAR-multifunctional occluder and Amplatzer occluders in transcatheter closure of patent arterial ducts and ventricular septal defects.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVentricular septal defect (VSD) is a common congenital heart defect that affects many individuals. Transcatheter closure has become a successful treatment method. However, certain devices used for closure can lead to life-threatening complications such as complete heart block. This systematic review aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of Amplatzer duct occluders (ADOs) types I and II for closing perimembranous VSDs (pmVSDs).
methodsThis review followed the PRISMA 2020 guidelines and searched multiple databases for English articles on pmVSD closure using ADO I/II published up to 2022. Relevant keywords were used and the data were categorized to report the incidence of common complications.
resultsThe study, which involved 1,691 patients with primary pmVSD and ages ranging from 6 months to 15 years, found that ADO type I had a high success rate with low rates of complete heart block and other complications. ADO type II had a higher rate of severe complications, particularly complete heart block. The overall estimated success rate for device implantation was 97.3%, with only one procedure-related death. The occurrence of complete heart block was 2.3%, and residual shunts were the most frequent complication (4.8%).
conclusionThe findings of this systematic review provide valuable insights into the use of ADO types I and II for closing pmVSDs. Healthcare professionals should be aware of these findings and closely monitor patients who undergo ADO device closure for pmVSDs. Further research is recommended to determine the specific indications for using each type of Amplatzer device in the relevant population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.