Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40103620›Full record

ArticlePathology oncology research : POR2025

Survival trends of gastrointestinal stromal tumor in real-world settings: a population-based retrospective study.

Guohua Jia, Xiangpan Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pathology oncology research : POR, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Guohua JiaCancer Center, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Xiangpan LiDepartment of Oncology, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: This study aims to evaluate whether survival outcomes for GIST patients have improved over the past decades and to identify the specific patient subgroups that have benefited from advances in treatment. Patients and methods: A total of 4,127 GIST patients diagnosed between January 1980, and December 2019, were included in this study using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-9 Registries. Survival differences among GIST patients were analyzed across five time periods (1980-1999, 2000-2004, 2005-2009, 2010-2014, and 2015-2019) and within demographic, neoplastic, temporal, economic, and geographic categories using the log-rank test. Multivariable Cox regression models were employed to identify risk factors associated with GIST-specific survival. Associations between time periods and GIST-specific mortality (TSM) were examined using a multivariable Cox regression model. Results: Survival outcomes for GIST patients significantly improved in the 2000-2009 period but showed no substantial improvement in the 2010-2019 period. After adjusting for age, gender, tumor location, ethnicity, tumor stage, median household income, and geographic area, the multivariable Cox regression models revealed that older age (≥65 years) (HR = 1.977, 95% CI = 1.470-2.657), tumors located outside the gastrointestinal tract (HR = 1.505, 95% CI = 1.267-1.786), regional lesions (HR = 2.225, 95% CI = 1.828-2.708), and distant lesions (HR = 5.177, 95% CI = 4.417-6.069) were independent risk factors for TSM (p < 0.05). After adjusting for time periods and age, gender, tumor location, tumor stage, median household income, patients in 2000-2004 (HR = 0.662, 95% CI = 0.523-0.839), 2005-2009 (HR = 0.431, 95% CI = 0.339-0.549), 2010-2014 (HR = 0.437, 95% CI = 0.341-0.561), and 2015-2019 (HR = 0.365, 95% CI = 0.273-0.489) had a significantly lower risk of TSM than patients in 1980-1999 (p < 0.05). Similarly, patients in 2005-2009 (HR = 0.661, 95% CI = 0.555-0.788), 2010-2014 (HR = 0.696, 95% CI = 0.578-0.838), and 2015-2019 (HR = 0.607, 95% CI = 0.476-0.773) also had a significantly lower risk of TSM than patients in 2000-2004 (p < 0.05). However, patients in 2010-2014 (HR = 1.042, 5% CI = 0.863-1.258) and 2015-2019 (HR = 0.945, 95% CI = 0.734-1.216) did not have a significantly lower risk of TSM compared to patients in 2005-2009 (p > 0.05). Conclusion: GIST survival has significantly improved during the period 2000-2009 but showed no substantial improvement in 2010-2019, with the turning point for lower risk of TSM being 2005. Innovative strategies are needed to further improve survival outcomes for GIST patients, particularly for older patients and those with tumors originating outside the gastrointestinal tract.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal NeoplasmsGastrointestinal Stromal TumorsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSEER ProgramSurvival RateYoung AdultGISToutcomesurvivaltrendtumor-specific mortality

Identifiers

PMID40103620
PMCPMC11913614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.