ArticleJournal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab2025
Development and validation of a highly-sensitive, quantitative LC-MS/MS assay to evaluate plasma oxytocin.
Article in Journal of mass spectrometry and advances in the clinical lab, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Salivary Oxytocin Levels in Children With and Without Autism: Group Similarities and Subgroup Variability.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Comparative serum imidazole propionate profiling in colorectal adenoma and cancer by UPLC-MS/MS.BMC gastroenterology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Oxytocin is a 9-amino acid peptide that serves as neuromodulator in the human central nervous system. This peptide is implicated in the regulation of diverse behaviors and plays a significant role in positive social interaction. Currently, oxytocin levels are measured using immunoassays. However, these methods have several limitations that can lead to false results and erroneous interpretation. Given the remarkably low endogenous level of oxytocin in human plasma (low ng/L levels), we developed and rigorously validated a novel and highly sensitive LC-MS/MS method for oxytocin quantification in plasma. Methods: Oxytocin was initially extracted using solid-phase extraction with an Oasis HLB 30 mg plate and then subjected to LC-MS/MS analysis. PBS-0.1 % BSA served as surrogate matrix for the preparation of validation samples and the calibration curve, ensuring no endogenous interference. The validation design followed the Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines. Precision, accuracy, and measurement uncertainty were determined using single-nested analysis of variance and e.noval software. Results: A lower limit of quantification of 1 ng/L was achieved. The method was validated for oxytocin concentrations ranging from 1 ng/L to 75 ng/L, with precision (coefficient of variation) below 10 %, accuracy ranging from 94 % to 108 %, and measurement uncertainty below 15 %. Conclusion: In this work, we developed and validated a highly sensitive LC-MS/MS method for the quantification of oxytocin in plasma. Our novel methodology is well-suited for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.