ArticleOncology letters2025
Synchronous occurrence of primary gastric and liver cancer: A case report.
Article in Oncology letters, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Primary gastric and liver cancers rank among the most prevalent malignant tumors of the digestive tract. Despite their serious implications for health, the global age-standardized incidence remains relatively low, at ~11.1 per 100,000 for primary gastric cancer and ~8.657 per 100,000 for primary liver cancer. Although the occurrence of multiple primary malignancies is not uncommon in clinical practice, reports of synchronous primary gastric and liver cancer are exceedingly rare. The present study describes a case involving a 60-year-old man diagnosed with synchronous primary gastric and liver cancer. The patient underwent endoscopic submucosal dissection for lesions located at the gastric angle, followed by laparoscopic resection of a small liver tumor. Pathological examinations revealed moderately differentiated intramucosal adenocarcinoma at the gastric angle and well-differentiated hepatocellular carcinoma in the liver. Following a 3-year follow-up, the patient remained in good health, with no evidence of disease recurrence. In conclusion, clinicians should exercise caution in patients presenting with distinct lesions to ensure that subtle malignancies are not overlooked, particularly in those with confirmed cancer. For patients with multiple cancers, it is crucial to ascertain whether the malignancies are primary, as this determination influences treatment strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.