ArticleImmuno-oncology technology2025
Clinical usefulness of anti-α3Gal immunoglobulin E assays for cetuximab-mediated anaphylaxis in head and neck cancer.
Article in Immuno-oncology technology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Fatal anaphylactic reactions to cetuximab remain a clinical issue, although they are associated with preexisting immunoglobulin E (IgE) directed against the galactose-α1,3-galactose epitope (α3Gal). We aimed to compare the clinical usefulness of the two assays and determine the prevalence of preexisting anti-α3Gal IgE. Patients and methods: An anti-α3Gal IgE assay was developed (70BP assay) and compared with a commercial assay [bovine thyroglobulin (bTG) assay]. Both assays were applied to two cohorts: 299 healthy blood donors and 41 patients with head and neck cancer treated with cetuximab, including four patients with a history of anaphylactic reaction (9.8%). Results: The prevalence of anti-α3Gal IgE was 6% and 5% using 70BP and bTG assays, respectively, in healthy blood donors. Among the head and neck cancer patients, the four who had an anaphylactic reaction were included in the seven (17.1%) and six (14.6%) patients with a signal above the detection threshold using the 70BP and bTG assays, respectively. This resulted in a sensitivity and negative predictive value of 100% for both assays, with a specificity of 91.9% and 94.6%, respectively, and a positive predictive value of 57.1% and 66.6% for the 70BP and bTG assays, respectively. Using an optimized threshold in the bTG assay, the prevalence of anti-α3Gal IgE in blood donors decreased to 1.3%, and five patients (12.2%) were eventually considered positive, giving a specificity of 97.3% and a positive predictive value of 80%. Conclusion: The predictive value of anti-α3Gal IgE using these two assays was excellent and useful in clinical practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.