SynthesisVeterinary medicine and science2025
Cryptosporidium in Rabbits: A Global Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prevalence, Species/Genotypes Distribution and Zoonotic Significance.
Synthesis in Veterinary medicine and science, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Prevalence, Genetic Diversity, and Zoonotic Transmission Potential of Cryptosporidium spp. in Snakes: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026Pooled it
- Genetic characterisation of Cryptosporidium spp., Encephalitozoon spp., and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in European brown hare (Lepus europaeus) in Central Europe.Parasite (Paris, France) · 2026Article
- Prevalence, Genetic Diversity, and Risk Factors ofThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026Review
- Gastrointestinal Parasites, Ectoparasites, and Fungi in Rabbits Attending Clinical Consultations and from Private Owners and Breeders in Portugal.Microorganisms · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the global prevalence, species/genotype distribution and zoonotic impact of Cryptosporidium in rabbits.
methodsA systematic search of PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science was performed for studies from 2000 to 25 October 2024 on Cryptosporidium spp. in rabbits. Data on publication/implementation years, prevalence rates, rabbit types, diagnostics, countries and species/genotypes were collected. A meta-analysis with random-effects models estimated overall prevalence and assessed heterogeneity using the I
resultsThis systematic review included 26 studies with 6093 rabbits from 9 countries, revealing a pooled Cryptosporidium spp. prevalence of 9% (95% CI: 6%-13.4%). Three zoonotic species were found in rabbits: Cryptosporidium cuniculus in 18 studies and each of C. parvum and C. andersoni in 1 study. The isolates included 2 genotypes of C. cuniculus (Va, Vb) and 1 genotype of C. parvum (IIc), along with 18 subtypes of C. cuniculus (VaA16, VaA18, VaA31, VbA18, VbA19, VbA21, VbA22, VbA23, VbA24, VbA25, VbA26, VbA28, VbA29, VbA31, VbA32, VbA33, VbA35 and VbA36). Among these, 11 subtypes (VbA19, VbA22-VbA26, VbA28, VbA29 and VbA31-VbA33) are identified as zoonotic. Pet rabbits had the highest Cryptosporidium spp. pooled prevalence at 21.9% (95% CI: 14.7%-31.3%), followed by farmed rabbits at 9.7% (95% CI: 5.1%-17.8%), wild rabbits at 8.8% (95% CI: 4.8%-15.5%) and laboratory rabbits at 1% (95% CI: 0.3%-3.1%), with higher rates noted in Africa and the AFR WHO region.
conclusionsThis study assessed the global distribution of Cryptosporidium spp. in rabbits, highlighting its zoonotic implications. It serves as a key resource for researchers, veterinarians and public health officials for future studies and control strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.