ArticleBJPsych open2025
The voices not heard: thematic analysis of asylum seekers' explanatory models of mental illness as elicited by the Cultural Formulation Interview.
Article in BJPsych open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Policy paper of the Committee on Ethics and Task Force on Migration and Mental Health: Migration and mental health of migrants, refugees, asylum seekers - Ethical dilemmas and concerns.European psychiatry : the journal of the Association of European Psychiatrists · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAsylum seekers have difficulty gaining access to mental healthcare. Lack of understanding of asylum seekers' mental illness explanatory models appears to be an important barrier. Gaining a better understanding of these explanatory models is crucial for ensuring the inclusion of asylum seekers in healthcare services. The Cultural Formulation Interview (CFI) might help to explore asylum seekers' explanatory models of mental illness.
aimsTo analyse asylum seekers' explanatory models as elicited by the CFI.
methodsThe CFI and its first supplementary module were carried out with asylum seekers with mental health problems. Transcriptions of the interviews underwent reflexive thematic analysis within a social constructivist framework.
resultsIn the analysis of 25 illness narratives, three major themes characterising asylum seekers' explanatory models were identified: a burden of the past, a disenabling current reality, and a personal position and individual experience.
conclusionsThe interplay among pre-, peri- and post-migration experiences, having a continuous impact on asylum seekers' mental health, was highlighted by the themes 'a burden of the past', and 'a disenabling current reality'. The theme 'a personal position and individual experience' revealed how the CFI enables self-determination in clinical encounters by embracing uncertainty and questioning the medicalisation of distress. The analysis characterises asylum seekers' symptoms as a personal idiom of distress within socio-relational contexts. The CFI provides a clinically useful framework for exploring asylum seekers' explanatory models and fostering dynamic understanding.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.