ArticleCurrent medical imaging2025
YOLOv8 Algorithm-aided Detection of Rib Fracture on Multiplane Reconstruction Images
Article in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A Systematic Literature Review of You Only Look Once Architectures (v1-v12) in Healthcare Systems.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to develop and assess the performance of a YOLOv8 algorithm-aided detection model for identifying rib fractures on multiplane reconstruction (MPR) images, addressing the limitations of current AI models and the labor-intensive nature of manual diagnosis.
methodsEthical approval was obtained, and a dataset comprising 624 MPR images, confirmed by CT, was collected from three regions of Tongji Hospital between May 2020 and May 2023. The images were categorized into training, validation, and external test sets. A musculoskeletal radiologist labeled the images, and a YOLOV8n model was trained and validated using these datasets. The performance metrics, including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, precision, recall, and F1 score, were calculated.
resultsThe refined YOLO model demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy, with sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates of 96%, 97%, and 97%, respectively. The AI model significantly outperformed the radiologist in terms of diagnostic speed, with an average interpretation time of 2.02 seconds for 144 images compared to 288 seconds required by the radiologist.
conclusionThe YOLOv8 algorithm shows promise in expediting the diagnosis of rib fractures on MPR images with high accuracy, potentially improving clinical efficiency and reducing the workload for radiologists. Future work will focus on enhancing the model with more feature learning capabilities and integrating it into the PACS system for human-computer interaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.