Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40103464›Full record

ArticleCurrent medical imaging2025

A Machine Learning Model Based on Multi-Phase Contrast-enhanced CT for the Preoperative Prediction of the Muscle-Invasive Status of Bladder Cancer.

Xucheng He, Yuqing Chen, Shanshan Zhou, Guisheng Wang, Rongrong Hua, Caihong Li, Yang Wang, Xiaoxia Chen, Ju Ye

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current medical imaging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xucheng HeDepartment of Radiology, the Third Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing100039, China.
Yuqing ChenDepartment of Radiology, the Third Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing100039, China.
Shanshan ZhouDepartment of Radiology, the Third Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing100039, China.
Guisheng WangDepartment of Radiology, the Third Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing100039, China.
Rongrong HuaDepartment of Radiology, the Third Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing100039, China.
Caihong LiDepartment of Radiology, Dongfang Hospital, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, Beijing100039, China.
Yang WangDepartment of Radiology, the Third Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing100039, China.
Xiaoxia ChenDepartment of Radiology, the Third Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing100039, China.
Ju YeDepartment of Radiology, the Third Medical Center, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing100039, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMuscle infiltration of bladder cancer has become the most important index to evaluate its prognosis. Machine learning is expected to accurately identify its muscle infiltration status on images.

objectiveThis study aimed to establish and validate a machine learning prediction model based on multi-phase contrast-enhanced CT (MCECT) for preoperatively evaluating the muscle-invasive status of bladder cancer.

methodsA retrospective study was conducted on bladder cancer patients who underwent surgical resection and pathological confirmation by MCECT scans. They were randomly divided into training and testing groups at a ratio of 8:2; we used an independent external testing set for verification. The radiomics features of lesions were extracted from MCECT images and radiomics signatures were established by dual sample T-test and least absolute shrinkage selection operator (LASSO) regression. Afterward, four machine learning classifier models were established. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration, and decision curve analysis were employed to evaluate the efficiency of the model and analyze diagnostic performance using accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score.

resultsThe best predictive model was found to have logic regression as the classifier. The AUC value was 0.89 (5-fold cross-validation range 0.83-0.96) in the training group, 0.80 in the test group, and 0.87 in the external testing group. In the testing and external testing group, the diagnostic accuracy, precision, sensitivity, specificity, and F1-score were 0.759, 0.826, 0.863, 0.729, 0.785, and 0.794, 0.755, 0.953, 0.720, and 0.809, respectively.

conclusionThe machine learning model showed good accuracy in predicting the muscle infiltration status of bladder cancer before surgery.

Indexed as

Machine LearningTomography, X-Ray ComputedUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsAgedContrast MediaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityContrast MediaBladder cancerContrast-enhanced computer tomography (CECT)Least absolute shrinkage selection operator (LASSO)Machine learning (ML)Muscle-invasiveReceiver operating characteristic (ROC)Uroepithelial carcinoma.

Identifiers

PMID40103464
PMCPMC13107385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.