Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40103339›Full record

ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025

Why not vaginal?-Nationwide trends and surgical outcomes in low-risk hysterectomies: A retrospective cohort study.

Johanna Wagenius, Sophia Ehrström, Karin Källén, Jan Baekelandt, Andrea Stuart

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Risk factors for infection after hysterectomy for benign disease.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Johanna WageniusInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0009-0001-6817-9161
Sophia EhrströmDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Division of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Danderyd Hospital, Danderyd, Sweden.
Karin KällénDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Center of Reproduction, Epidemiology, Tornblad Institute, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-5765-2630
Jan BaekelandtDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Imelda Hospital, Bonheiden, Belgium.
Andrea StuartInstitute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.

Funding

Stig och Ragna Gorthon 2022-2847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe rate of vaginal hysterectomies is declining globally. We investigated surgical techniques, outcomes, and costs in a large national cohort of benign hysterectomies with prerequisites for vaginal surgery. MATERIAL AND

methodsA retrospective register-based cohort study with benign hysterectomies in the Swedish GynOp registry 2014-2023 (n = 17 804). Inclusion criteria were non-prolapse, non-endometriosis with uterus weight <300 g. The cohort was divided into a low-risk and a standard group, with the low-risk group having optimal conditions for vaginal hysterectomy: no previous caesarian section (CS), no previous abdominal surgery, Body Mass Index (BMI) <30, and no nulliparous patients. Surgical outcomes were quantified using crude and adjusted risk ratios (RR, ARR). Costs were calculated and compared between abdominal (AH), laparoscopic (LH), robot-assisted (RH), and vaginal hysterectomies (VH).

resultsThe rate of AH and VH decreased during the period studied. RH increased and was the most common surgical technique 2021-2023 (33.2%). VH had the shortest surgical time and was the cheapest method. In the low-risk group, 25.2% of the patients were operated on vaginally. AH had more postoperative complications and longer hospitalization compared to VH in the low-risk group. LH had less severe intraoperative complications, ARR = 0.38 (95% CI 0.17-0.86) but more mild postoperative complications, ARR = 1.24 (95% CI 1.05-1.46) compared to VH in the low-risk group. LH had more conversions, ARR = 1.46 (95% CI 1.00-2.12), longer surgical time, ARR = 2.73 (95% CI 2.46-3.00) and longer hospital stay, ARR = 1.26 (95% CI 1.12-1.43) compared to VH. Mild (ARR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.16-0.66) and severe (ARR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.05-0.58) intraoperative complications and bleeding >500 mL (ARR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.04-0.34) were less common in RH versus VH in the low-risk group. There were no differences between RH and VH regarding postoperative complications and reoperations. Surgical time <45 min was less common in RH versus VH (ARR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.42-0.54) and RH had a significantly longer postoperative hospital stay (ARR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.33).

conclusionsA decline of vaginal hysterectomies in Sweden 2014-2023 among patients with prerequisites for vaginal surgery was shown. VH was the cheapest method with few postoperative complications and short hospitalization. Our results support the vaginal route in low-risk hysterectomies.

Indexed as

Hysterectomy, VaginalAdultFemaleHumansLaparoscopyMiddle AgedPostoperative ComplicationsRegistriesRetrospective StudiesRobotic Surgical ProceduresSwedenTreatment Outcomecomplicationscostminimally invasive surgerysurgical outcomevaginal hysterectomy

Identifiers

PMID40103339
PMCPMC11981104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.