ArticleActa obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica2025
Why not vaginal?-Nationwide trends and surgical outcomes in low-risk hysterectomies: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Risk factors for infection after hysterectomy for benign disease.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- National implementation of vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery for benign hysterectomies: A historical cohort study of Swedish data 2021-2023.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2026Article
- Why not vaginal?-Nationwide trends and surgical outcomes in low-risk hysterectomies: A retrospective cohort study.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Article
- Age-related patterns in hysterectomy: indications and surgical route selection in a three-year tertiary-center cohort.Annals of Saudi medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe rate of vaginal hysterectomies is declining globally. We investigated surgical techniques, outcomes, and costs in a large national cohort of benign hysterectomies with prerequisites for vaginal surgery. MATERIAL AND
methodsA retrospective register-based cohort study with benign hysterectomies in the Swedish GynOp registry 2014-2023 (n = 17 804). Inclusion criteria were non-prolapse, non-endometriosis with uterus weight <300 g. The cohort was divided into a low-risk and a standard group, with the low-risk group having optimal conditions for vaginal hysterectomy: no previous caesarian section (CS), no previous abdominal surgery, Body Mass Index (BMI) <30, and no nulliparous patients. Surgical outcomes were quantified using crude and adjusted risk ratios (RR, ARR). Costs were calculated and compared between abdominal (AH), laparoscopic (LH), robot-assisted (RH), and vaginal hysterectomies (VH).
resultsThe rate of AH and VH decreased during the period studied. RH increased and was the most common surgical technique 2021-2023 (33.2%). VH had the shortest surgical time and was the cheapest method. In the low-risk group, 25.2% of the patients were operated on vaginally. AH had more postoperative complications and longer hospitalization compared to VH in the low-risk group. LH had less severe intraoperative complications, ARR = 0.38 (95% CI 0.17-0.86) but more mild postoperative complications, ARR = 1.24 (95% CI 1.05-1.46) compared to VH in the low-risk group. LH had more conversions, ARR = 1.46 (95% CI 1.00-2.12), longer surgical time, ARR = 2.73 (95% CI 2.46-3.00) and longer hospital stay, ARR = 1.26 (95% CI 1.12-1.43) compared to VH. Mild (ARR = 0.33, 95% CI 0.16-0.66) and severe (ARR = 0.17, 95% CI 0.05-0.58) intraoperative complications and bleeding >500 mL (ARR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.04-0.34) were less common in RH versus VH in the low-risk group. There were no differences between RH and VH regarding postoperative complications and reoperations. Surgical time <45 min was less common in RH versus VH (ARR = 0.47, 95% CI 0.42-0.54) and RH had a significantly longer postoperative hospital stay (ARR = 1.16, 95% CI 1.02-1.33).
conclusionsA decline of vaginal hysterectomies in Sweden 2014-2023 among patients with prerequisites for vaginal surgery was shown. VH was the cheapest method with few postoperative complications and short hospitalization. Our results support the vaginal route in low-risk hysterectomies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.