Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40103189›Full record

ArticleJournal of phycology2025

Applications of environmental DNA monitoring for seaweed reproductive phenology: A case study with giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera).

Madeline R Ward, Christopher P Burridge, Sharee McCammon, Adam Smolenski, Catriona L Hurd, Wouter Visch

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of phycology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Madeline R WardInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Christopher P BurridgeSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Sharee McCammonSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Adam SmolenskiSchool of Natural Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.
Catriona L HurdInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9965-4917
Wouter VischInstitute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Tasmania, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4291-6239

Funding

Phycological Society of America Grants-in-Aid of Research (GIAR)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Monitoring the seasonal reproductive cycles of seaweeds is crucial for effective population and ecosystem management, as well as mariculture seedstock collection. Traditional methods, such as visual monitoring by SCUBA diving or snorkeling, are costly, labor-intensive, and limited in temporal and spatial coverage. This study explores substituting these methods with environmental DNA (eDNA) techniques for giant kelp (Macrocystis pyrifera, order Laminariales). This laboratory study aimed to determine the minimum detectable concentration of zoospores and sporophyte tissue needed for detecting the reproductive phenology of M. pyrifera and to assess the ability and sensitivity to discriminate between life stages. The study involved syringe-filtering seawater samples through 0.45-μm pore-size filters before quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) analysis with species-specific primers. There was a strong positive correlation between zoospore concentration and eDNA copies per μL (ρ = 0.982, p < 0.001), and a weak correlation for sporophyte wet weight (ρ = 0.367, p = 0.134). There was a significant difference between zoospore and zoospore + sporophyte treatments (p = 0.010), indicating the substantial influence of sporophyte tissue on detected eDNA quantity. Sporophyte tissue obscures the zoospore signal, especially at lower zoospore concentrations (<37 zoospores · mL

Indexed as

DNA, AlgalDNA, EnvironmentalEnvironmental MonitoringKelpMacrocystisReproductionSeasonsSeaweedDNA, AlgalDNA, EnvironmentaleDNAkelp forest restorationmacroalgaeqPCRseaweedseaweed aquaculturezoospores

Identifiers

PMID40103189
PMCPMC12044407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.