ArticleJournal of cardiovascular electrophysiology2025
Endo-Epicardial vs. Endocardial-Only Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Patients With Ischemic Cardiomyopathy: The EPIC-VT Trial Design.
Article in Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRadiofrequency ablation is a cornerstone therapy for patients with ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM) presenting with ventricular tachycardia (VT). In this context, ablation is typically performed endocardially as a first-line approach. However, despite acute procedural success, the risk of recurrence remains high, potentially due to the presence of epicardial substrate. Several observational studies have suggested the potential benefits of a first-line endo-epicardial approach in decreasing recurrence. In this context, the EPIC-VT trial was designed to compare endocardial-only ablation versus combined endo-epicardial ablation as a first-line approach in ICM patients with VT.
methodsThe EPIC-VT trial is a prospective, multicenter, controlled, randomized, open-label superiority trial with two parallel groups (endocardial-only approach vs. combined endo-epicardial approach) in a 1:1 ratio. The primary objective of this study is to demonstrate that a combined endo-epicardial approach reduces the risk of VT recurrence compared to an endocardial approach alone in patients with ICM. Patients will be followed for 2 years after the procedure. RESULTS AND
conclusionTo date, only retrospective studies have compared VA recurrences in patients with ICM, depending on whether ablation was performed using an endocardial or an endo-epicardial approach, with conflicting results. A meta-analysis suggested an advantage of the endo-epicardial approach over the endocardial approach (odds ratio = 0.39 [95% CI: 0.18-0.83]). However, the level of evidence remains low, and no controlled randomized study has confirmed this hypothesis. If the EPIC-VT study confirms the superiority of a first-line endo-epicardial approach, such strategy could become the preferred option for VT ablation in ICM, thereby reducing the risk of VA recurrence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.