Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40103187›Full record

Observational studyJournal of clinical nursing2025

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Cross-Validation of the Italian Version of the EPICC Spiritual Care Competency Self-Assessment Tool for Clinical Nurses.

Michela Piredda, Alessio Lo Cascio, Maddalena De Maria, Roberto Latina, Anna Marchetti, Anna De Benedictis, Giorgia Petrucci, Linda Ross, Wilfred McSherry, Maria Grazia De Marinis

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational StudyValidation Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of clinical nursing, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Michela PireddaDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Research Unit Nursing Science, Campus Bio-Medico di Roma University, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5998-476X
Alessio Lo CascioDepartment of Biomedicine and Prevention, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5581-4114
Maddalena De MariaDepartment of Life Science, Health, and Health Professions, Link Campus University, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0507-0158
Roberto LatinaDepartment of Health Promotion, Mother and Child Care, Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-7829-3654
Anna MarchettiDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Research Unit Nursing Science, Campus Bio-Medico di Roma University, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3099-0274
Anna De BenedictisDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Research Unit Nursing Science, Campus Bio-Medico di Roma University, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8655-0895
Giorgia PetrucciDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-4324-2600
Linda RossSchool of Care Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Education, University of South Wales, Wales, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3978-5952
Wilfred McSherryDepartment of Nursing, School of Health, Education, Policing and Sciences, University of Staffordshire, Staffordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0932-5875
Maria Grazia De MarinisDepartment of Medicine and Surgery, Research Unit Nursing Science, Campus Bio-Medico di Roma University, Rome, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7039-6280

Funding

Center of Excellence for Nursing Scholarship
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo cross-culturally adapt and psychometrically test the Italian version of the EPICC Spiritual Care Competency Self-Assessment Tool for clinical nurses (EPICC Tool-It).

designMulticentre, cross-sectional validation study.

methodsThe 28-item EPICC Tool was translated into Italian and culturally adapted following a rigorous methodology. A nationwide survey was conducted. Psychometric evaluation included content validity, structural validity (exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses), construct validity (known group analysis) and reliability using Cronbach's alpha, McDonald's omega and factor score determinacy.

resultsThe sample included 725 clinical nurses (76% female, 80% hospital-based), on average 38.7 years old (SD 11.33), with 14.6 years (SD 11.03) of experience. Confirmatory factor analysis supported a four-factor model (Knowledge of spirituality, Attitudes towards spirituality and spiritual care, Knowledge of spiritual care and Skills in spiritual care), with a second-order factor for the EPICC Tool-It. Construct validity was supported through known group analysis, showing score variation based on nurses' experience, education and religiosity. Internal consistency was excellent across all factors and the overall scale.

conclusionA valid, multidimensional instrument is provided to assess spiritual care competencies in Italian-speaking nurses. The EPICC Tool-It is suitable for research and practice, facilitating evaluation of self-perceived competencies and educational effectiveness. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: The use of the EPICC Tool-It by nursing managers, educators and clinicians is recommended in both clinical and research settings to support education on spiritual care competencies. IMPACT: The EPICC Tool-It sets reliable measurement standards for spiritual care competencies, enhancing holistic care and comprehensive understanding of competencies globally. REPORTING: This study adheres to the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients, service users, caregivers, or the public were not involved in the study. However, nurses as target users of the tool participated in the cultural adaptation and validation process.

Indexed as

Cross-Cultural ComparisonSelf-AssessmentSpiritualityAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesEPICC tool‐itnursing competenciespsychometric testingspiritual care competencies

Identifiers

PMID40103187
PMCPMC12489437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.