Article in Cell transplantation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registry
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what money
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Deqiang HanCell Therapy Center, Beijing Municipal Geriatric Medical Research Center, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, and Key Laboratory of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Ministry of Education, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0001-8187-0355
Sichang ChenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yuan WangCell Therapy Center, Beijing Municipal Geriatric Medical Research Center, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, and Key Laboratory of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Ministry of Education, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xueyao WangCell Therapy Center, Beijing Municipal Geriatric Medical Research Center, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, and Key Laboratory of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Ministry of Education, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xingzhe WangCell Therapy Center, Beijing Municipal Geriatric Medical Research Center, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, and Key Laboratory of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Ministry of Education, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Tianqi ZhengCell Therapy Center, Beijing Municipal Geriatric Medical Research Center, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, and Key Laboratory of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Ministry of Education, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhiguo ChenCell Therapy Center, Beijing Municipal Geriatric Medical Research Center, National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Diseases, and Key Laboratory of Neurodegenerative Diseases, Ministry of Education, Xuanwu Hospital Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.ORCID 0000-0003-1508-510X
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
6 · The paper itself
Abstract
Cell transplantation is a promising approach for addressing neurodegenerative conditions. In this study, we developed a robot-assisted stereotactic microinjection system for transplanting cells. We evaluated the factors that affect cellular graft viability and other properties, including the gauge of the syringe needle and the injection rate. We systematically compared the synchronous withdrawal injection (SWI) and fixed-point injection (FPI) procedures in agarose and rat brain models.
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.
Robot-Assisted Stereotactic Microinjection Method for Precision Cell Transplantation in Rat and Canine Models. · full record | OpenQuestion