ArticleInternational journal of retina and vitreous2025
Comparative efficacy of half-dose and one-third-dose photodynamic therapy in chronic central serous chorioretinopathy: a retrospective study.
Article in International journal of retina and vitreous, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo compare the efficacy and safety of half-dose and one-third-dose photodynamic therapy (PDT) with verteporfin in patients with chronic central serous chorioretinopathy (CSC).
methodsThis retrospective study included 72 eyes from 72 patients with chronic CSC treated with either one-third-dose (2 mg/m²) or half-dose (3 mg/m²) PDT. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), subretinal fluid (SRF) thickness, subfoveal choroidal thickness (SFCT), and optical coherence tomography (OCT) features were evaluated at baseline, 3 months, and 12 months. Fluorescein angiography (FA) was used to guide laser application. Treatment outcomes, including SRF resolution, BCVA gain, and recurrence rates, were compared between the two groups.
resultsAt 12 months, complete SRF resolution was achieved in 40 eyes (78.4%) in the half-dose group and 15 eyes (71.4%) in the one-third-dose group. The recurrence rate of SRF was significantly higher in the one-third-dose group (20%) compared to the half-dose group (7.5%) (P =.015). BCVA improved significantly in both groups, with mean increases from 72.4 ± 3.9 to 77.1 ± 5.6 letters in the one-third-dose group and from 74.4 ± 4.2 to 80.2 ± 2.19 letters in the half-dose group. The proportion of patients achieving a ≥ 10-letter gain was higher in the half-dose group (52%) compared to the one-third-dose group (28.5%, P =.001). Both groups exhibited significant reductions in CRT, SRF thickness, and SFCT (P <.001), with no significant intergroup differences. Baseline CRT and fluorescein leakage patterns influenced treatment response.
conclusionsBoth one-third-dose and half-dose PDT effectively improved visual and anatomical outcomes in patients with chronic CSC. However, half-dose PDT demonstrated superior efficacy in achieving SRF resolution and greater visual acuity gains with a lower recurrence rate. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.