SynthesisBMC psychology2025
Measurement issues in longitudinal studies of mental health problems in children with neurodevelopmental disorders.
Synthesis in BMC psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Transdiagnostic determinants of access to mental health care for youth with disabilities: a systems-oriented structured narrative review.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- From Monoamines to Systems Psychiatry: Rewiring Depression Science and Care (1960s-2025).Biomedicines · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop and test an approach for assessing the risk of bias in four measurement-related domains key to the study of mental health problem trajectories in children with neurodevelopmental disorders (NDD): (1) conceptual overlap between mental health problems and NDD diagnostic criteria, (2) over-reliance on a single informant, (3) unwarranted omission of the child's perspective, and (4) the use of instruments not designed for or adapted to the population.
methodsBuilding upon a previous systematic review, this study established supplementary criteria for assessing the risk of bias domains. Following this, the criteria were applied to measures used in 49 longitudinal studies of mental health problems in children with NDD.
resultsThe general risk of bias across domains was rated as high in 57.1% of the 49 included studies. The highest risk of bias was seen in domain four (rated as high in 87.8% of studies) and the lowest in domain three (24.5%).
conclusionsThe risk of bias items enhance our understanding of the quality of the evidence about mental health problem trajectories in children with NDD. The methodological quality of future research can be increased by selecting conceptually clear scales developed for the population - preferably in the form of cognitively accessible self-report scales - and adopting a multi-informant approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.