Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40102943›Full record

ArticleRespiratory research2025

Extracellular vesicle-bound S100A8/A9 is differentially expressed in septic shock and prompts acute lung injury.

Jiangmei Wang, Weiliang Wu, Tingting Wen, Guoping Zheng, Guanguan Qiu, Huifeng Qian, Ruoyang Zhang, Jie Xia, Yaoqin Hu, Ruoqiong Huang and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Respiratory research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Frontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Jiangmei Wang *The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine and National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, 3333 Binsheng Road, Hangzhou, 310052, Zhejiang, China.
Weiliang Wu *The Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine and National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, 3333 Binsheng Road, Hangzhou, 310052, Zhejiang, China.
Tingting WenThe First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine, 79 Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310006, Zhejiang, China.
Guoping ZhengShaoxing Second Hospital, 123 Yanan Road, Shaoxing, 312000, Zhejiang, China.
Guanguan QiuShaoxing Second Hospital, 123 Yanan Road, Shaoxing, 312000, Zhejiang, China.
Huifeng QianShaoxing Second Hospital, 123 Yanan Road, Shaoxing, 312000, Zhejiang, China.
Ruoyang ZhangThe Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine and National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, 3333 Binsheng Road, Hangzhou, 310052, Zhejiang, China.
Jie XiaThe Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine and National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, 3333 Binsheng Road, Hangzhou, 310052, Zhejiang, China.
Yaoqin HuThe Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine and National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, 3333 Binsheng Road, Hangzhou, 310052, Zhejiang, China.
Ruoqiong HuangThe Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine and National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, 3333 Binsheng Road, Hangzhou, 310052, Zhejiang, China.
Ruoxi ZangThe Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine and National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, 3333 Binsheng Road, Hangzhou, 310052, Zhejiang, China.
Zhenkai LeThe Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine and National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, 3333 Binsheng Road, Hangzhou, 310052, Zhejiang, China.
Qiang ShuThe Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine and National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, 3333 Binsheng Road, Hangzhou, 310052, Zhejiang, China. shuqiang@zju.edu.cn.
Jianguo XuThe Children's Hospital of Zhejiang University School of Medicine and National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, 3333 Binsheng Road, Hangzhou, 310052, Zhejiang, China. jxu5@yahoo.com.

Funding

Basic Public Welfare Research Program of Zhejiang Province LGF22H150010Basic Public Welfare Research Program of Zhejiang Province LY24H010001Health Commission of Shaoxing 2023SKY100Health Commission of Shaoxing 2023SKY103Health Commission of Zhejiang Province 2024KY491National Natural Science Foundation of China 82070074National Natural Science Foundation of China 82272191National Natural Science Foundation of China 82370080
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis is a common indirect insult leading to acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Circulating extracellular vesicles (EVs) have been reported to participate in the pathogenesis of sepsis. However, the alteration of EV-bound S100A8/A9 during septic shock, along with the role of S100A8/A9 in driving acute lung injury, remains unexplored.

methodsEVs were isolated from the plasma of patients upon admission with sepsis or septic shock, as well as from healthy controls. Levels of EV S100A8/A9 were assayed via ELISA. To examine the effects and underlying mechanisms of septic shock EVs in acute lung injury, these EVs were administered intratracheally into wild-type C57BL/6 mice or mice with a deficiency of advanced glycation end-products (RAGE). In addition, a mouse model of polymicrobial sepsis was introduced using cecal ligation and puncture (CLP).

resultsLevels of EV S100A8/A9 were significantly elevated in patients with sepsis or septic shock compared to healthy controls. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis demonstrated that EV S100A8/A9 effectively distinguished between septic shock and sepsis and had predictive potential for the development of ARDS. Notably, the levels of S100A8/A9 in EVs and alveolar macrophages from CLP mice were significantly higher than those in sham mice. Intratracheal administration of septic shock EVs directly induced acute lung injury and M1 macrophage polarization in a lipopolysaccharide-independent manner. Septic shock EVs were efficiently taken up by alveolar macrophages in vivo, leading to a significant increase in S100A8/A9 levels, which was inhibited by preincubating the EVs with an S100A8/A9 neutralizing antibody. Additionally, mice with deficiency in RAGE, a receptor for S100A8/A9, were partially protected from acute lung injury induced by septic shock EVs. In vitro, septic shock EVs prompted a proinflammatory response in bone marrow-derived macrophages. This response was blocked by preincubating the EVs with the S100A8/A9 neutralizing antibody.

conclusionsOur results suggested that EV S100A8/A9 has potential value in distinguishing septic shock from sepsis and predicting the development of ARDS. Septic shock EVs-induced lung injury is at least partially mediated through S100A8/A9-RAGE pathway, involving the activation of alveolar macrophages.

Indexed as

Acute Lung InjuryCalgranulin ACalgranulin BExtracellular VesiclesShock, SepticAgedAnimalsBiomarkersDisease Models, AnimalFemaleHumansMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutMiddle AgedBiomarkersCalgranulin ACalgranulin BS100A8 protein, humanS100A9 protein, humanS100A9 protein, mouseAcute lung injuryAcute respiratory distress syndromeExtracellular vesiclesS100A8/A9Sepsis

Identifiers

PMID40102943
PMCPMC11921512

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.