ArticleBMC health services research2025
How are fast tracks organized in adult and pediatric emergency departments in Switzerland? A cross-sectional survey.
Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Distinct clinical clusters of paediatric patients with status epilepticus: Retrospective cohort study.Developmental medicine and child neurology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn response to the challenges faced by emergency departments (ED), including overcrowding and high patient volumes, Fast Track (FT) systems are designed to optimize patient flow, yet their implementation and impact in Switzerland remain understudied. Our study provides a comprehensive description of Fast Track (FT) processes across both pediatric and adult settings in Switzerland and compares challenges.
methodsWe conducted a cross-sectional online survey of ED leadership in Switzerland from May to September 2023, using the WHO SARA framework to explore FT processes. The survey included 28 pediatric EDs and their corresponding adult EDs, with questions addressing FT availability, staffing, infrastructure, and operational challenges. Results were analyzed descriptively, providing insights into FT organization and highlighting barriers to implementation and expansion.
resultsThe survey achieved a response rate of 93% (52/56 EDs). Overall, 68% of surveyed hospitals have implemented a FT system, with a higher prevalence in adult EDs (88%) than in pediatric EDs (59%). The absence of FTs in certain pediatric departments was primarily due to structural and personnel constraints. Most FTs are managed internally by hospitals, employing emergency team members, and occasionally general practitioners, reflecting a tailored approach to staffing based on departmental needs. Despite the strategic organization of FTs, operational challenges persist; 45% of respondents identified staff shortages as a major challenge, particularly in pediatric FTs (63%) compared to adult FTs (32%). Financial barriers, including disparities in external physician compensation, remain significant obstacles to FT expansion. Satisfaction levels among EDs with their FT systems were generally high, with improvements in personnel resource allocation and patient flow frequently reported.
conclusionWhile FT systems in Swiss EDs have enhanced patient care and operational efficiency, their expansion and effectiveness are hampered by staffing and financial limitations. Addressing these barriers requires a collaborative effort to reform health system policies and financial frameworks, ensuring the sustainable implementation of FTs to meet the growing demands of emergency care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.