Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40102847›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Interpretable machine learning models for prolonged Emergency Department wait time prediction.

Hao Wang, Nethra Sambamoorthi, Devin Sandlin, Usha Sambamoorthi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hao WangDepartment of Emergency Medicine, John Peter Smith Health Network, Integrative Emergency Services, 1500 S. Main St., Fort Worth, TX, 76104, USA. hwang@ies.healthcare.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5105-0951
Nethra SambamoorthiCRM Portals LLC, Fort Worth, TX, 76126, USA.
Devin SandlinDepartment of Emergency Medicine, John Peter Smith Health Network, Integrative Emergency Services, 1500 S. Main St., Fort Worth, TX, 76104, USA.
Usha SambamoorthiCollege of Pharmacy, University of North Texas Health Science Center, 3500 Camp Bowie Blvd, Fort Worth, TX, 76107, USA.

Funding

AIM-AHEAD Coordinating Center - All Four CoresOT2OD032581 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI Paul Avillach, Bettina M. Beech · 2021 to 2026
$168.7M
Texas Minority Health, Research and Outreach (MiHERO)S21MD012472 · NIMHD · UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS HLTH SCI CTR · PI JAMBOOR K. VISHWANATHA · 2017 to 2026
$18.0M
National Institute of Health/Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning Consortium to Advance Health Equity and Researcher Diversity Grant 1OT2OD032581-01NIH HHS OT2 OD032581NIMHD NIH HHS 5S21MD012472-05NIMHD NIH HHS S21 MD012472
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveProlonged Emergency Department (ED) wait times lead to diminished healthcare quality. Utilizing machine learning (ML) to predict patient wait times could aid in ED operational management. Our aim is to perform a comprehensive analysis of ML models for ED wait time prediction, identify key feature importance and associations with prolonged wait times, and interpret prediction model clinical relevance among ED patients.

methodsThis is a single-centered retrospective study. We included ED patients assigned an Emergency Severity Index (ESI) level of 3 at triage. Patient wait times were categorized as <30 minutes and ≥30 minutes (prolonged wait time). We employed five ML algorithms - cross-validation logistic regression (CVLR), random forest (RF), extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), artificial neural network (ANN), and support vector machine (SVM) - for predicting patient prolonged wait times. Performance assessment utilized accuracy, recall, precision, F1 score, false positive rate (FPR), and false negative rate (FNR). Furthermore, using XGBoost as an example, model key features and partial dependency plots (PDP) of these key features were illustrated. Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) were employed to interpret model outputs. Additionally, a top key feature interaction analysis was conducted.

resultsAmong total 177,665 patients, nearly half of them (48.20%, 85,632) experienced prolonged ED wait times. Though all five ML models exhibited similar performance, minimizing FNR is associated with the most clinical relevance for wait time predictions. The top features influencing patient wait times and gaining the top ranked interactions were ED crowding condition and patient mode of arrival.

conclusionsNearly half of the patients experienced prolonged wait times in the ED. ML models demonstrated acceptable performance, particularly in minimizing FNR when predicting ED wait times. The prediction of prolonged wait times was influenced by multiple interacting factors. Proper application of ML models to clinical practice requires interpreting their predictions of prolonged wait times in the context of clinical significance.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalMachine LearningWaiting ListsAdultAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesTime FactorsTriageEmergency departmentMachine learningPerformanceWait time

Identifiers

PMID40102847
PMCPMC11917090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.