Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40102833›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2025

Strengthening the WHO Emergency Care Systems Framework: insights from an integrated, patient-centered approach in the Copenhagen Emergency Medical Services system-a qualitative system analysis.

Simone Böbel, Jeske Verhoeven, Mirjam Scholz, Bart Penders, Lorraine Frisina Doetter, Helle Collatz Christensen, Thomas Krafft

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Simone BöbelDepartment of Health, Ethics and Society, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands. s.bobel@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Jeske VerhoevenDepartment of Health, Ethics and Society, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Mirjam ScholzFraunhofer Institute for Manufacturing Engineering and Automation IPA, Stuttgart, Germany.
Bart PendersDepartment of Health, Ethics and Society, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.
Lorraine Frisina DoetterCollaborative Research Centre (CRC) 1342 & Research Center on Inequality and Social Policy (SOCIUM), The University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Helle Collatz ChristensenPrehospital Center, Region Zealand, Næstved, Denmark.
Thomas KrafftDepartment of Health, Ethics and Society, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, Maastricht, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe World Health Organization Emergency Care Systems Framework (WHO ECSF) was designed to offer guidance in establishing and developing effective Emergency Medical Services (EMS) systems. However, evolving disease patterns, changing community needs, and a rising demand for emergency care services, highlight the need for more integrated and patient-centered EMS systems. This evolution should be mirrored in the WHO ECSF. Hence, this study explores system components of the Copenhagen (CPH) EMS that may enhance the WHO ECSF´s emphasis on integrated and patient-centered care.

methodsA qualitative case study was conducted from April through June 2021, including (i) semi-structured interviews with researchers and professionals at the CPH EMS and (ii) a scoping literature review using PubMed, Google Scholar, expert recommendations and snowballing.

resultsThirteen expert interviews and 35 records were analyzed, revealing key integrated care components within the CPH EMS. These include education and citizen participation programs, early triaging, differentiated care pathways coordinated with primary care and out-of-hours services, and specialized mobile care units complementing "traditional" ambulance services. Technology supports integrated and patient-centered care by facilitating early differentiation of care, efficient dispatching, and communication. Data-driven approaches were fostered through technology-aided data collection, supporting research, quality improvement, and patient safety. The identified components were mapped within the WHO ECSF´s four domains: scene, transport, facility, and cross-cutting elements. Due to the prehospital focus of the CPH EMS, limited data was available for the "facility" site.

conclusionsThe CPH EMS demonstrates an integrated, patient-centered systems approach that emphasizes seamless coordination along the patient care pathway, bridging EMS with broader health and social systems. Research-informed initiatives and intelligent technology solutions underscore the potential for enhancing the WHO ECSF. These findings highlight the importance of continued system integration and a holistic health perspective, including in emergency settings. Further research is needed to assess the transferability of these components across diverse global contexts.

trial registrationNot applicable.

Indexed as

Delivery of Health Care, IntegratedEmergency Medical ServicesPatient-Centered CareDenmarkHumansInterviews as TopicQualitative ResearchSystems AnalysisWorld Health OrganizationEmergency medical services, CopenhagenIntegrated carePatient-centered carePrehospitalSmart technologyWHO emergency care system framework

Identifiers

PMID40102833
PMCPMC11916934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.