ArticleBMC complementary medicine and therapies2025
Developing a deep learning model for the automated monitoring of acupuncture needle insertion: enhancing safety in traditional acupuncture practices.
Article in BMC complementary medicine and therapies, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Functional brain alterations associated with acupuncture for chronic pain: a scoping review of fMRI studies.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Pooled it
- AI-enabled comprehensive patient safety management in acupuncture: from risk identification to continuous quality improvement.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence guided acupuncture decision making and treatment: a review of research.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Advancing Safety in Acupuncture: Strategies, Best Practices, and Training for a Risk-Free Practice.Medical acupuncture · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence in acupuncture: bridging traditional knowledge and precision integrative medicine.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAcupuncture is a widely practiced traditional therapy, yet safety concerns, particularly needle breakage and retention, remain critical issues that can lead to complications such as infections, organ injury, or chronic pain. This study aimed to develop a deep learning model to monitor acupuncture needle insertion, detect instances of needle breakage, and prevent needle retention, ultimately improving patient safety and treatment outcomes.
methodsA deep learning model based on the YOLOv8 architecture was trained using a dataset comprising 192 images from a commercial image library and 73 clinical images captured during real-world acupuncture sessions. Images were preprocessed through cropping and annotation, and augmented to enhance model generalizability. Five-fold cross-validation was employed to ensure robust performance. Model evaluation metrics included precision, recall, F1 score, and mean average precision (mAP) at Intersection over Union (IoU) thresholds of 50% (mAP@50) and 50-95% (mAP@50-95).
resultsThe model demonstrated strong performance, achieving an average precision of 88.0% and a recall of 82.9%. The mean average precision was 88.6% at mAP@50 and 62.9% at mAP@50-95, indicating high reliability in detecting acupuncture needles across diverse scenarios. These results highlight the potential of the model to enhance clinical safety by minimizing risks associated with needle breakage and retention, regardless of practitioner experience or patient demographics.
conclusionsThe proposed YOLOv8-based deep learning model offers a reliable method for real-time needle monitoring in acupuncture. Its integration into clinical workflows can improve safety and efficiency, especially in underserved regions or settings with less experienced practitioners. Future research should validate the model with larger, more diverse datasets and explore its application in various healthcare settings.
trial registrationNot applicable; this study did not involve a healthcare intervention requiring registration. Data collection adhered to ethical standards with institutional approval (TCHIRB-11310004).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.