ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
A novel method for subgroup discovery in precision medicine based on topological data analysis.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe Mapper algorithm is a data mining topological tool that can help us to obtain higher level understanding of disease by visualising the structure of patient data as a similarity graph. It has been successfully applied for exploratory analysis of cancer data in the past, delivering several significant subgroup discoveries. Using the Mapper algorithm in practice requires setting up multiple parameters. The graph then needs to be manually analysed according to a research question at hand. It has been highlighted in the literature that Mapper's parameters have significant impact on the output graph shape and there is no established way to select their optimal values. Hence while using the Mapper algorithm, different parameter values and consequently different output graphs need to be studied. This prevents routine application of the Mapper algorithm in real world settings.
methodsWe propose a new algorithm for subgroup discovery within the Mapper graph. We refer to the task as hotspot detection as it is designed to identify homogenous and geometrically compact subsets of patients, which are distinct with respect to their clinical or molecular profiles (e.g. survival). Furthermore, we propose to include the existence of a hotspot as a criterion while searching the parameter space, addressing one of the key limitations of the Mapper algorithm (i.e. parameter selection).
resultsTwo experiments were performed to demonstrate the efficacy of the algorithm, including an artificial hotspot in the Two Circles dataset and a real world case study of subgroup discovery in oestrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Our hotspot detection algorithm successfully identified graphs containing homogenous communities of nodes within the Two Circles dataset. When applied to gene expression data of ER+ breast cancer patients, appropriate parameters were identified to generate a Mapper graph revealing a hotspot of ER+ patients with poor prognosis and characteristic patterns of gene expression. This was subsequently confirmed in an independent breast cancer dataset.
conclusionsOur proposed method can be effectively applied for subgroup discovery with pathology data. It allows us to find optimal parameters of the Mapper algorithm, bridging the gap between its potential and the translational research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.