Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40102726›Full record

ArticleBMC emergency medicine2025

Rural hospital incident command leaders' perceptions of disaster preparedness.

Jason P Murphy, Clara Bergström, Lina Gyllencruetz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jason P MurphyDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Umeå University, Umeå, 90187, Sweden. jason.murphy@rkh.se.
Clara BergströmDepartment of Diagnostics and Intervention, Umeå University, Umeå, 90187, Sweden.
Lina GyllencruetzDepartment of Nursing, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecent trends indicate that the frequency of major incidents (MIs) is increasing. Healthcare systems are vital actors in societies' responses to MIs. Well-prepared healthcare systems may mitigate the effects of MIs. Disaster preparedness is based on region-specific risk and vulnerability analyses (RVAs). Hospital incident command groups (HICGs) are commonly formed per hospital's contingency plan MI to aid in disaster response. Acquiring situational awareness and decision-making in the face of uncertainty are known challenges for HICGs during MIs. However, the remoteness of rural hospitals presents unique challenges.

aimThe aim of this study was to explore HICG leaders' perceptions of disaster preparedness in rural hospitals.

methodsA qualitative study with semi-structured, focus group, and individual interviews was used. The data were analyzed through inductive content analysis.

resultsThe analysis generated the main category, HICGs' confidence in handling major incidents and four categories. These were Uncertainty and level of recognition (containing two subcategories); Awareness of challenges and risks (containing two subcategories); Factors that facilitate preparedness, response, and leadership (containing three subcategories); and Prerequisites for decision-making (containing three subcategories and four subcategories).

conclusionsHICG leaders generally perceived their hospital's disaster preparedness as adequate. However, preparedness was found to be influenced by several factors. The findings revealed a complex interplay of factors influencing preparedness and response, particularly highlighting challenges related to geographical isolation and resource constraints. Effective preparedness requires a comprehensive understanding of local contexts, hospital capabilities, and risks, which directly impacts training, decision-making, and resource allocation. Addressing the identified vulnerabilities necessitates targeted interventions focused on situational awareness, decision-making, collaboration, and training. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelDisaster PlanningHospitals, RuralLeadershipAdultFemaleFocus GroupsHumansInterviews as TopicMaleQualitative ResearchDecision-makingDisaster medicineDisaster preparednessHospital incident commandMajor incidentRural preparedness

Identifiers

PMID40102726
PMCPMC11921675

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.