ReviewThe Korean journal of internal medicine2025
Sex differences in diagnosis and treatment of heart failure: toward precision medicine.
Review in The Korean journal of internal medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Circulating CD38 shows stronger association with incident heart failure in women despite lower levels: sex differences and kidney-function context.Biology of sex differences · 2026Article
- Gender disparities in heart failure diagnosis and management: under the radar.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Identification of isoliquiritigenin as a promising compound targeting lactate metabolism for heart failure alleviation.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Biomarkers in Heart Failure: A Review and a Wish.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- The Association Between Chronic Heart Failure and Metabolic Syndrome Increases the Cost of Hospitalization.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
There are sex-related differences in the pathophysiology and phenotype of heart failure (HF) as well as the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs between women and men due to biological differences, such as heart and vessel size, response to blood volume and pressure, body water and muscle compositions, and dominant sex hormones. Therefore, target drug doses required to achieve the same clinical effect differ between the sexes, while there may also be sex-related differences in side effects of a given drug at the same dose. These biological differences have been reflected in the results of clinical trials. Moreover, women have been underrepresented in pharmacological therapy trials as well as having lower device implantation rates than men. Therefore, the currently recommended target doses of medications based on clinical trials may not be appropriate for women. Although guidelines for HF have been standardized since the last major revision in 2021, most do not differentiate by sex. This review focuses on evidence regarding sex-related differences in multiple aspects of HF, including epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical features, treatment, and prognosis, highlighting the need for sex-specific treatment guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.