Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40102698›Full record

ArticlePhysiological reports2025

Corticomuscular and intermuscular coherence during evidence accumulation in sensorimotor decision-making.

Yvonne F Visser, W Pieter Medendorp, Luc P J Selen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physiological reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Yvonne F VisserDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-6425-0466
W Pieter MedendorpDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Luc P J SelenDonders Institute for Brain, Cognition and Behaviour, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

Funding

Donders Centre for CognitionInterreg NWE-RE:HOMENWA ORC-1292.19.298NWO SGW-406.21.GO.009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evidence accumulation processes during decision-making are thought to continuously feed into the motor system, preparing multiple competing motor plans, of which one is executed when the evidence is complete. Previously, the state of this accumulation process has been studied by reading out the preparatory state of the motor system with evoked responses, once per trial. In this study, we aim to continuously track the sensorimotor decision during the trial using corticomuscular (CMC) and intermuscular coherence (IMC). We recorded EEG and EMG of healthy young adults (n = 34) who viewed random dot motion stimuli, with varying strengths across trials, and indicated their perceived motion direction by reaching towards one of two targets, requiring either flexion or extension of the elbow. Coherence was computed in the beta band. After stimulus presentation, both CMC and IMC show an initial phasic pattern, which is followed by sustained coherence patterns at a level that depends on stimulus strength for CMC. Prior to reach onset, the CMC for different stimulus strengths had a tendency to settle at similar levels. This tendency tentatively marks a stimulus-independent decision bound. We conclude that CMC, and to a lesser extent IMC, track the evidence accumulation process on a single trial.

Indexed as

Decision MakingMotor CortexMuscle, SkeletalPsychomotor PerformanceAdultElectroencephalographyElectromyographyFemaleHumansMaleMotion PerceptionYoung Adultcorticomuscular coherencedecision‐makingevidence accumulationintermuscular coherencemotor control

Identifiers

PMID40102698
PMCPMC11919635

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.