Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40102617›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Coastal business perception of coral value and payment for coral restoration.

Rachel R Carlson, Joanna Klitzke, Gretchen C Daily, Larry B Crowder, Borja G Reguero, Gregory P Asner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Rachel R CarlsonEmmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA. rrcarlson@berkeley.edu.
Joanna KlitzkeEmmett Interdisciplinary Program in Environment and Resources, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Gretchen C DailyDepartment of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
Larry B CrowderHopkins Marine Station, Stanford University, Monterey, CA, USA.
Borja G RegueroCoastal Science and Policy, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA.
Gregory P AsnerCenter for Global Discovery and Conservation Science, Arizona State University, Hilo, HI, USA.

Funding

National Science Foundation (NSF) DGE-1656518
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coral reefs provide important economic benefits to coastal businesses, supporting recreation and tourism and protecting property from storms. Yet, these benefits are at risk worldwide as corals decline rapidly, and investment in restoration is lacking. With their direct dependence on coral health, coastal businesses may represent an important sector for funding coral restoration; however, it is unclear whether businesses perceive coral reef services as valuable or themselves as reef stewards. We measured business perceptions of coral health and value in Hawai'i and identified traits correlated with business decisions to participate in coral restoration at three payment thresholds. We found that businesses see limited economic value in coral reefs. In areas where corals provide substantial ecosystem services (flood protection, tourism revenue), businesses did not consistently rate coral value as high. Nonetheless, businesses showed strong willingness to pay for coral restoration, which was linked to pro-nature motives, reputation, and Native Hawaiian ownership. Results highlight key strategies for engaging private entities in coral restoration.

Indexed as

AnthozoaCommerceConservation of Natural ResourcesCoral ReefsEnvironmental Restoration and RemediationAnimalsEcosystemHawaiiHumansCoastal resilienceCoralEcosystem servicesNature-based solutionsRestorationTourism

Identifiers

PMID40102617
PMCPMC11920439

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.